By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukrainian forces launched a precision strike on the headquarters of Russia’s 810th Naval Infantry Brigade in Belaya, marking the second such attack in two weeks. This follows a previous strike on Christmas Day and repeated unsuccessful Russian assaults near Pogrebki. The 810th Brigade, significantly weakened after months of fighting, has suffered heavy losses and is being targeted with a variety of long-range weapons systems. These attacks highlight Ukraine’s growing deep-strike capabilities and the continued pressure on Russian forces in the Kursk region.
Read the original article here
A Russian Marine Corps brigade has headquarters all over Kursk. This seemingly haphazard distribution of command centers has proven disastrous, as evidenced by two devastating Ukrainian strikes in just two weeks. The sheer number of locations suggests a complete lack of strategic planning and a disregard for basic military principles of establishing secure, consolidated command structures. It raises the question: do Russian forces even bother with a proper, secure setup, or is the approach more akin to a hastily erected, temporary camp? Perhaps this explains their vulnerability.
The attacks themselves were clearly successful, inflicting significant casualties and disrupting Russian operations. Reports suggest the devastation is widespread, with the remnants of the brigade’s command structures scattered across Kursk, leaving them highly vulnerable. The impact on Russian morale is likely substantial, and the efficiency of their operations must have been severely compromised by such relentless targeting.
Adding another layer of complexity is the reported involvement of North Korean soldiers in the Kursk region. Initial reports speak of large numbers being deployed, described by some as being used as essentially cannon fodder—sacrificed to soak up Ukrainian ammunition rather than contribute to meaningful combat operations. Their lack of training, equipment, and support rendered them exceptionally vulnerable. The implications are disturbing—a blatant disregard for human life, and an apparent willingness to expend expendable forces in a brutal, attritional war.
The presence of these North Korean soldiers further complicates the situation, possibly explaining the scattered nature of the Russian Marine Corps brigade’s headquarters. Were these various locations used to disperse the ill-equipped and poorly-led North Korean troops in the hopes of mitigating losses from Ukrainian strikes? The consequences speak for themselves. The strategy, if indeed it was a strategy, backfired spectacularly. It’s a tragic illustration of military incompetence and the callous disregard for the lives of both Russian and North Korean soldiers.
This pattern of repeated strikes highlights a significant failure in Russian military planning and adaptability. The initial attack should have been a wake-up call, prompting a re-evaluation of their deployment strategy and a consolidation of their command structures. However, the second attack, just weeks later, indicates an abject failure to learn from previous mistakes and adapt their operational procedures. The repeated targeting of these dispersed headquarters speaks volumes about the lack of intelligence gathering and situational awareness within the Russian military.
The near-total destruction of the brigade’s headquarters, twice within a short period, raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of the Russian military command structure. The scale of the losses and the ease with which the Ukrainian forces were able to locate and strike these supposedly strategically important locations point to significant intelligence failures and a lack of defensive measures. The sheer number of these headquarters across Kursk, rather than being strategically advantageous, seems to have rendered them exceptionally vulnerable.
The situation also underscores the significant technological disparity between the Ukrainian and Russian forces. Ukrainian precision strikes, seemingly guided by excellent intelligence, successfully targeted multiple Russian command centers despite their supposedly dispersed nature, while Russian forces remain unable to prevent these repeated blows. This underscores not only a technological gap but a potentially more profound operational and strategic inadequacy.
The Ukrainian strikes, especially considering the likely high casualty rates among both Russian and North Korean personnel, represent a significant military achievement and a potential turning point in the conflict. They point towards the escalating capabilities of Ukrainian forces and the mounting challenges faced by the Russian military. The complete lack of a successful response after the first strike leads one to wonder about the level of command and control, and raises serious questions about the ability of the Russian military to conduct effective operations in the face of determined and capable opposition. The repeated failures, resulting in the catastrophic loss of life and military assets, suggest a systemic failure within the Russian military apparatus that is unlikely to be easily rectified.