By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Unless substantial new U.S. aid is provided, Ukraine will likely face complete defeat and Russian control within the next 12-18 months. This presents a significant challenge for President-elect Trump, who previously promised a swift resolution to the conflict but now faces a reality where Putin seeks Ukraine’s complete capitulation. Trump must choose between accepting a humiliating global defeat or redoubling U.S. support for Ukraine, a decision impacting both Ukraine’s fate and the success of his presidency. Putin believes he is on the verge of victory and is unlikely to negotiate unless his military position changes drastically. A Russian victory would entail the complete eradication of Ukrainian independence and identity, resulting in widespread suffering and repression.
Read the original article here
Trump is facing a potential catastrophic defeat in Ukraine, and if Ukraine falls, it will be exceedingly difficult to portray the situation as anything other than a colossal failure for the United States and its president. The outcome of the war in Ukraine carries significant weight, far beyond the immediate geopolitical implications. It’s a referendum on American leadership, foreign policy, and the efficacy of its alliances.
Trump’s past actions and statements regarding Ukraine paint a troubling picture. His consistent downplaying of the threat posed by Russia, coupled with his past attempts to leverage aid to Ukraine for personal political gain, suggest a disturbing lack of concern for the sovereignty and well-being of the Ukrainian people. His history of undermining established alliances and institutions further fuels concerns about his ability to effectively lead the United States in a time of global crisis.
A Ukrainian defeat would represent more than just a loss for Ukraine; it would be interpreted as a victory for Russia and a validation of Trump’s approach to international affairs. This would embolden adversaries and potentially embolden authoritarian regimes around the world, undermining the credibility and influence of the United States on the global stage. The implications extend beyond Ukraine, impacting relationships with allies, and increasing the risk of further instability and aggression.
Furthermore, the economic consequences of a Ukrainian defeat could be severe, potentially leading to increased energy prices, supply chain disruptions, and broader economic instability. The humanitarian crisis that would likely accompany a Russian victory would be of immense magnitude, adding to the already immense global burden of displacement and suffering. Such an outcome would inevitably lead to increased global instability.
Trump’s potential response to a Ukrainian defeat is equally concerning. His consistent pattern of deflecting blame and shifting responsibility onto others suggests he would likely attribute any failure in Ukraine to the Biden administration, despite his own history of actions that could be interpreted as undermining the Ukrainian war effort. This would further divide the nation, deepen political polarization, and potentially further erode trust in democratic institutions.
The very real possibility of a Ukrainian defeat necessitates a thorough and honest assessment of the implications for the United States and the world. The failure to provide adequate support to Ukraine would not only represent a moral failure but also a strategic blunder of immense proportions, impacting America’s standing in the world, its economy, and its security. Trump’s potential role in this failure warrants serious scrutiny and raises significant questions about his fitness for office.
The severity of a Ukrainian defeat would not be readily obscured. The consequences would be far-reaching, impacting the global order and America’s standing in the international community. The fall of Ukraine would be perceived by many as a validation of Russia’s aggression and potentially encourage other authoritarian states to pursue similar expansionist policies, emboldened by the apparent lack of effective resistance from the United States.
Beyond the geopolitical implications, a Ukrainian defeat would significantly damage the morale and confidence of America’s allies, potentially undermining the credibility of US commitments and alliances. This would weaken the collective security architecture that has underpinned peace and stability in Europe and beyond for decades, with unpredictable and potentially devastating long-term consequences. This damage to America’s international reputation would be extremely difficult to repair.
The internal repercussions within the United States would be equally profound. A clear demonstration of American impotence in the face of Russian aggression would likely erode public trust in the government’s ability to protect national interests and its capacity to effectively respond to major global challenges. This erosion of trust could exacerbate domestic political divisions, contributing to further polarization and instability.
In conclusion, the potential fall of Ukraine under the shadow of a Trump presidency presents a catastrophic scenario with far-reaching and long-lasting consequences. The strategic implications, coupled with the potential for domestic upheaval, underscore the profound importance of preventing such an outcome and the critical need for a clear and decisive response from the United States and its allies. The failure to act decisively would likely leave an indelible mark on the world stage, deeply impacting the global order, alliances, and America’s credibility.