By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite initial bipartisan concerns regarding Chinese government surveillance and subsequent attempts to ban the app, TikTok’s status in the U.S. has shifted. The Supreme Court upheld a law allowing the government to regulate foreign-owned apps operating within the country. However, former President Trump, initially advocating for a ban, now champions TikTok due to its effectiveness in disseminating disinformation, a tactic beneficial to his political strategies. This shift highlights the platform’s capacity for manipulating users’ emotions and promoting divisive content, potentially undermining civic engagement and mental well-being. Ultimately, TikTok’s influence, while initially viewed through a national security lens, is now recognized for its potential to manipulate public discourse.
Read the original article here
Trump’s sudden embrace of TikTok is deeply unsettling, and it speaks volumes about his priorities. It suggests that his supposed disdain for China is far outweighed by his insatiable appetite for misinformation, a tool he expertly wields to maintain power and influence. His past pronouncements about banning the platform seem almost laughable in light of his current fawning over it.
This isn’t about a sudden change of heart regarding free trade or national security concerns; it’s about the realization that TikTok offers an unparalleled platform for spreading disinformation – something Trump relies on more than any other political tactic. His boastful proclamation of being a “big star” on TikTok underscores his understanding of its potential as a propaganda machine. He’s not merely leveraging the platform; he’s actively cultivating it.
The assertion that TikTok surpasses even Twitter in its dissemination of misinformation is a stark statement. While the algorithms of both platforms are opaque, TikTok’s algorithm, combined with its vast user base, creates a perfect storm of divisive content, emotionally manipulative narratives, and outright lies. This is hardly a coincidence; authoritarian regimes the world over have long recognized the power of propaganda, and TikTok, despite its veneer of “free speech,” seems to facilitate the same goals.
The narrative that financial gain is the driving force behind Trump’s TikTok affections rings undeniably true. His past behavior demonstrates a remarkable susceptibility to bribery and influence peddling. The sudden shift in his stance, coupled with the lavish attention he’s showered on TikTok’s CEO, strongly suggests that significant financial incentives are at play. He’s not interested in policy or national security; he’s interested in what lines his pockets.
The argument that Trump’s supposed hatred of China is a mere smokescreen for his true admiration of Xi Jinping and the Chinese authoritarian system is persuasive. His past actions and rhetoric, while outwardly antagonistic towards China, often seem performative, tailored to appease his base. A genuine concern about China would hardly align with his pursuit of financial gain through collaboration with a Chinese-owned entity.
The convenient timing of Trump’s TikTok advocacy is also telling. It coincides with increasing efforts to censor information critical of authoritarian regimes. This isn’t about defending free speech; it’s about controlling the narrative and silencing dissent. This aligns with Trump’s consistent pattern of attempting to manipulate information flow to serve his personal interests. His past attempts to control messaging through other social media platforms suggest a calculated strategy to ensure a consistent stream of propaganda.
This new chapter underscores a pattern: Trump’s positions are incredibly malleable, subject to change based on personal financial gain or flattery. He’s demonstrated time and again that his allegiances are fluid and that his commitment to principles is nonexistent. His actions regarding TikTok, therefore, are entirely consistent with his broader modus operandi.
The hypocrisy of Trump’s sudden love for TikTok, given his previous calls for a ban, is striking. This shift highlights the lack of ideological consistency in his decision-making. What was once a national security threat is now a prized asset, a clear indication that his priorities are driven by self-interest rather than principled policy. His actions reinforce the perception of him as a highly corruptible figure, someone easily swayed by financial enticements.
The idea that this isn’t just about money but also about surveillance capabilities is equally concerning. TikTok, with its vast user base and sophisticated data collection capabilities, presents a compelling tool for monitoring and suppressing dissent. Trump’s newfound affection for the platform suggests an eagerness to exploit these capabilities for his own political gain, putting the privacy and safety of American citizens at risk.
In conclusion, Trump’s sudden fascination with TikTok is far from benign. It’s a blatant display of his willingness to compromise his supposed values – and the nation’s security – for personal gain. His embrace of the platform reveals a preference for disinformation and control over genuine concern for national interests. His inconsistent stance, his history of financial dealings, and his potential for abuse of power all paint a disturbing picture of a leader driven by self-interest above all else. The implications of this embrace extend far beyond the realm of social media and pose a significant threat to democratic principles and American security.