By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the 2024 election, Nick Fuentes, despite briefly withdrawing support from Trump’s campaign due to perceived outside influence, delivered a vulgar message seemingly endorsing the Republican Party’s perceived dismissal of voters until the next election cycle. This statement follows Fuentes’ recent outspoken opposition to the H-1B visa program, contrasting sharply with Elon Musk’s support. Fuentes’ actions highlight the ongoing internal conflicts within the Republican party and the influence of far-right figures. His previous “Groyper war” declaration against the Trump campaign further contextualizes his post-election rhetoric.
Read the original article here
Trump fans are discovering, or perhaps more accurately, *should* be discovering, the extent of his genuine concern for their well-being. The short answer? It’s practically nonexistent. Many believe that the depth of Trump’s disregard for his supporters is far beyond a simple lack of empathy; it borders on contempt. He views them, according to this perspective, as nothing more than easily manipulated pawns in his quest for power.
This isn’t a new revelation for many observers. The argument is that Trump’s actions throughout his presidency, and even before, consistently demonstrated a callous indifference to the plight of his followers. The COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, serves as a potent example. His administration’s response, or rather, lack thereof, contributed to the devastating loss of life, disproportionately impacting his rural base. Yet, this apparent disregard seemingly failed to shake their unwavering allegiance.
Further evidence cited includes his refusal to pardon January 6th rioters, despite their fervent support. This act, considered by many to be a betrayal of loyalty, still hasn’t significantly altered their unwavering faith in him. Similarly, his blatant disregard for their concerns, openly expressed at rallies with the statement “I don’t care about you, I just want your vote,” appears to have had little impact.
The question then becomes: why this unwavering loyalty despite such overt displays of indifference? Some believe it’s a matter of deeply ingrained political identity. Years invested in this ideology have created an insurmountable barrier to accepting any contradictory evidence. Cognitive dissonance, the discomfort of holding conflicting beliefs, keeps many firmly entrenched in their support, despite the glaring contradictions.
Others contend that the core of their support is not loyalty, but rather a desire for certain groups to experience pain. This isn’t about genuine affection for Trump; it’s about shared animosity towards specific targets. This narrative suggests their loyalty is instrumental, a means to an end, rather than based on any genuine affection or respect.
Even figures within the far-right are expressing similar sentiments. One prominent figure, known for his extreme views, directly articulated the transactional nature of the relationship between Trump and his base: “Sorry. Thank you for your vote, now go fuck yourself.” This stark assessment reflects a growing awareness, even within Trump’s inner circle, that his loyalty is purely situational.
The perspective is that Trump’s supporters aren’t simply unaware of his true feelings; they’re incapable of accepting them. Their worldview, deeply entrenched in right-wing media and echo chambers, prevents them from objectively assessing his actions. Information contradicting their preconceptions is dismissed, filtered out, or reframed to maintain their existing beliefs.
This isn’t to say that *no* Trump supporters are questioning their loyalty. However, the overwhelming consensus is that any disillusionment is minimal and unlikely to result in a significant shift in their political alignment. They’ll find alternative explanations, blaming outside forces like “the liberal media” or “the deep state” for any perceived failings.
The assertion is that this cycle will repeat itself. Trump will continue to exploit their grievances and biases, securing their votes with promises and rhetoric that hold little to no substance. The transactional nature of their relationship will persist, with Trump consistently prioritizing self-interest above the needs of his supporters. And, crucially, many believe that this dynamic perfectly illustrates the broader issues of power, manipulation, and the limitations of critical thinking in contemporary politics.
The core argument remains that Trump’s supposed loyalty is merely a calculated strategy, a tool for acquiring and maintaining power. He utilizes the grievances and fears of his base to achieve his political goals, discarding them once they become expendable. This is not a matter of him caring “a little” – it’s a matter of him caring “not at all.” This is not a new revelation, but rather a stark confirmation of what many have believed all along.