By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Lululemon’s post-holiday sale offers significant discounts on its popular athletic apparel. This event provides a strong incentive for consumers to return to fitness routines, capitalizing on the renewed focus on health and wellness often associated with the new year. The sale includes a wide range of items, encouraging shoppers to refresh their workout wardrobes. Deep discounts on high-quality gear make this a prime opportunity for consumers seeking value and performance.
Read the original article here
Trump’s midnight message, a familiar refrain of late, once again focused on his bizarre obsession with windmills. The sheer absurdity of this continued fixation is striking, especially considering its lack of any logical basis within the broader context of energy policy or environmental concerns. His insistence on removing them, framed as a simple command, “Get rid of windmills!”, reveals a level of disconnect from reality that’s both unsettling and concerning.
This isn’t a new development; this anti-windmill stance has been a recurring theme for years, often linked to a perceived aesthetic issue near one of his golf courses. The fact that this personal grievance continues to dominate his public pronouncements, particularly in such a dramatic late-night setting, speaks volumes about his priorities and his apparent inability to move beyond trivial personal disputes.
The sheer volume of misinformation surrounding wind energy is alarming. Claims that windmills cause cancer or pose an insurmountable threat to bird populations are demonstrably false, easily refuted by any cursory review of available data. Wind energy, in comparison to other energy sources, has a significantly lower impact on bird populations. Cars and pesticides, for instance, pose a far greater threat. Yet, this crucial context is consistently ignored in favor of perpetuating this baseless fear.
It’s particularly frustrating that the very technology he demonizes is relatively inexpensive and contributes significantly to a more sustainable energy future. His opposition, therefore, actively works against the interests of consumers, who would likely face increased energy prices if wind power were eliminated. The economic implications of such a decision are easily foreseeable and entirely ignored within his pronouncements.
The repeated use of the outdated term “windmills,” instead of the accurate “wind turbines,” highlights not only his lack of understanding but also a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the technology. It’s as if the inaccuracy itself is part of the messaging, a way to create a deliberately simplistic and easily digestible—though wholly inaccurate—narrative. This deliberate obfuscation of reality is deeply disturbing.
Furthermore, the consistent repetition of this message, often in the dead of night, suggests a deeper issue. Concerns about potential cognitive decline have been raised, and it’s hard to ignore the parallels between his behavior and the symptoms associated with sundowning, a condition affecting individuals with dementia or Alzheimer’s disease. His erratic behavior and nonsensical pronouncements raise serious concerns about his fitness for office, adding a level of urgency to the discussion beyond just the energy policy itself.
The lack of coherent reasoning behind this obsession is truly astounding. His vehement hatred, originating from a personal slight related to his Scottish golf course, has transformed into a full-blown crusade. This is not a reasoned policy position; it’s a personal vendetta against inanimate objects, a childish tantrum played out on the world stage. Such irrationality, coupled with the ease with which these pronouncements are repeated and accepted by his followers, exposes a deeply worrying disconnect between reality and perception within a significant segment of the population.
Ultimately, Trump’s continued insistence on “getting rid of windmills” serves as a microcosm of broader issues at play. It represents a rejection of scientific consensus, a disregard for economic consequences, and a prioritization of personal grievances over public good. It’s a stark reminder of the potential dangers of electing leaders who prioritize personal narratives and unsubstantiated claims over evidence-based policy decisions. It’s a deeply troubling phenomenon and one that deserves much more critical analysis than it typically receives. The continued acceptance of such blatantly false and demonstrably harmful statements is a far more worrying issue than the “windmill” obsession itself.