By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite President Trump’s prior public disavowal of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, his early executive actions in his second term closely mirror many of its policy proposals. A significant portion of his executive orders align with the blueprint’s conservative agenda, particularly regarding immigration, deregulation, and government restructuring. While not all proposals are identical, the overlap demonstrates a substantial influence of Project 2025 on Trump’s policy direction. The appointments of key Project 2025 figures to prominent administration roles further underscore this connection.
Read the original article here
Trump’s early actions aren’t merely mirroring Project 2025; they are Project 2025 in action. The entire premise of Project 2025 was, from its inception, to essentially hand over significant executive responsibilities to a network of individuals largely affiliated with the Heritage Foundation, effectively allowing Trump to step back and pursue less demanding activities. This isn’t some complex conspiracy theory; it’s playing out right before our eyes.
Trump’s recent golfing trips speak volumes. His supposed engagement in the day-to-day governance of the country is largely a façade. The reality is a rubber-stamping operation where he signs executive orders without truly understanding their contents, based on his own televised comments. This isn’t effective leadership; it’s a carefully constructed charade.
This isn’t some accidental alignment; it’s a deliberate strategy. The policies being implemented are directly lifted from the Project 2025 playbook. The idea that Trump was unaware of this project is, frankly, ludicrous. His denial should be seen for what it is: a blatant lie. His supporters, however, seem to believe this charade of “genius-level” decision-making, somehow unaware of the reality of a shadow government operating in plain sight.
The media’s response has been, at best, underwhelming. Initial reporting framed the issue as “Dem panic” and focused on Trump’s denials, rather than on the undeniable evidence of Project 2025’s influence. The lack of strong investigative journalism leaves the public vulnerable to misinformation and allows the situation to escalate without proper scrutiny. The focus on perceived trivialities, like Biden’s age, instead of substantive policy shifts represents a failure in journalistic responsibility.
The consequences of this inaction are already manifesting. Real-world examples demonstrate the direct impact of these policies. Access to healthcare is being compromised, as exemplified by the difficulty a voter experienced obtaining prescription refills due to policy shifts. The costs of everyday items are increasing, adding a significant burden to the populace. These are not hypothetical concerns; these are the realities faced by ordinary citizens.
The troubling access Project 2025 operatives seem to have to federal employee emails only exacerbates the situation. The potential for manipulation and the erosion of transparency are significant threats to a functioning democracy. This isn’t about partisan politics; it’s about the integrity of the government itself.
Trump’s ease of manipulation is a key factor. He’s surrounded by individuals who understand his weaknesses and skillfully exploit them to advance their agenda. The result is a president who acts as a figurehead, signing off on policies he doesn’t comprehend while maintaining a veneer of control. This reality needs to be acknowledged, not glossed over.
It’s past time for a straightforward conversation. The rhetoric surrounding Project 2025 needs to abandon the careful tiptoeing around the core issue. The reality is that Trump’s actions are not merely reflective of Project 2025; they are Project 2025 unfolding in real-time. We’ve been warned, the evidence is overwhelming, and the consequences are far-reaching and devastating. Ignoring it would be a gross dereliction of responsibility. The situation is grave, and the time for decisive action is now. The continued acceptance of this as “normal” politics threatens the very foundation of our democratic system. The electorate’s failure to grasp this reality is a catastrophic mistake with potentially irreversible consequences.