By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President-elect Trump’s inaugural committee employed Patrick Lee, a board member of the Ohio Clean Water Fund, a charity accused by the Ohio Attorney General of misappropriating funds intended for East Palestine, Ohio, residents affected by a train derailment. The charity raised over $141,000, but allegedly only gave $10,000 to the intended recipient, keeping the rest. Lee, though not named as a defendant, settled with the Attorney General, paying restitution and facing restrictions on future charitable activities in Ohio. Despite Lee’s lawyer denying wrongdoing, the settlement required significant financial penalties and prohibitions against future charitable involvement within the state.
Read the original article here
Patrick Lee, a deputy director of public liaison for Trump’s inaugural committee, found himself at the center of controversy when his involvement with the “Ohio Clean Water Fund” came to light. This so-called charity, of which Lee was a board member, allegedly raised a substantial $141,000 for the victims of the East Palestine train derailment disaster.
However, instead of using the funds to aid those affected, the organization only donated a paltry $10,000, pocketing the remaining $131,000. This blatant misappropriation of funds raised significant public outrage and prompted legal action.
The Ohio Attorney General’s office initiated a case, resulting in a settlement where the Ohio Clean Water Fund was compelled to return the misappropriated $131,000. Further, as part of the settlement, Lee was permanently barred from fundraising for any charitable cause within the state of Ohio. This outcome highlights the severity of the situation and the legal consequences faced by those involved in such deceptive practices.
The incident underscores a pattern of alleged impropriety involving individuals connected to the Trump administration and charitable fundraising. This case evokes memories of other instances involving questionable charitable activities linked to figures in the Trump orbit, reinforcing a concerning trend.
The sheer audacity of the alleged scheme, the relatively small amount actually donated compared to the funds raised, and the subsequent legal repercussions paint a stark picture. It begs the question of whether this is an isolated incident or representative of a larger problem.
The scale of the alleged fraud, albeit seemingly modest in terms of overall financial impact, is amplified by the context. These were funds specifically raised for those impacted by a devastating environmental disaster, and the fact that a significant portion of these donations were allegedly diverted for personal gain causes considerable public concern.
Lee’s involvement, given his position within the Trump inaugural committee, further adds fuel to the fire. It raises questions about oversight, accountability, and the ethical standards expected of those in positions of power and public trust. The fact that such accusations arise from someone previously holding such a prominent role highlights the ongoing scrutiny faced by those associated with the Trump administration.
The settlement reached with the Ohio Attorney General provides a form of justice and restitution for those who believed their donations would be used to help the victims of the disaster. However, the lasting impact on public trust and the potential for similar future schemes remains a cause for concern.
This event also raises larger questions about the mechanisms in place to regulate charitable organizations and ensure their transparency and accountability. The ease with which these funds were allegedly misappropriated raises concerns about the effectiveness of existing oversight measures.
The situation underscores the need for increased vigilance and strengthened regulations to prevent such incidents from recurring in the future. This includes improving transparency requirements for charities, enforcing stricter accountability measures for those managing charitable funds, and enhancing public awareness of how to identify potentially fraudulent organizations.
Ultimately, the case of the Ohio Clean Water Fund and Patrick Lee’s involvement serves as a cautionary tale. It is a reminder of the importance of due diligence when donating to charitable causes and the need for robust mechanisms to ensure the integrity of such organizations. The long-term effects on public trust and the need for reform within the charity sector are paramount considerations moving forward.