By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Melania Trump launched her own meme coin, $MELANIA, shortly after her husband, President-elect Donald Trump, unveiled his own, $TRUMP. While $MELANIA initially saw a surge in value, reaching over $12 per coin and a $12 billion market cap, the launch coincided with a dramatic over 40% crash in the value of $TRUMP, losing over $7.5 billion in market capitalization. Both coins function as expressions of support, rather than investment opportunities, according to their respective websites. This development follows Trump’s appointment of David Sacks as his crypto and AI czar, signaling a potential shift in the nation’s approach to cryptocurrency.
Read the original article here
Trump’s meme coin experienced a swift and dramatic crash shortly after Melania Trump launched her own cryptocurrency. This event underscores the inherent volatility and risk associated with meme coins, particularly those linked to controversial figures. The rapid decline likely reflects a combination of factors, including market manipulation, a lack of intrinsic value, and the inherent skepticism surrounding the Trump family’s ventures into the cryptocurrency space.
The timing of the crash, immediately following Melania’s launch, raises questions about potential coordination or influence between the two ventures. It’s possible that the initial hype surrounding the Trump coin was deliberately engineered to inflate its value, allowing for a profitable exit strategy for those involved before the inevitable crash. This would be a classic “pump and dump” scheme, exploiting the enthusiasm of inexperienced investors.
The comments surrounding the event reveal a widespread sense of cynicism and disgust. Many viewed the entire affair as a blatant money-laundering scheme, designed to funnel foreign funds and enrich the Trump family. Others pointed to the susceptibility of investors to manipulation, suggesting a level of culpability on the part of those who willingly participated in what was clearly a high-risk investment.
The sheer audacity of the Trumps launching multiple cryptocurrencies has been met with widespread derision. The perception that the family is attempting to leverage their public image for personal financial gain, regardless of the consequences, fueled negative sentiment and further accelerated the decline of the coins’ value. The lack of any tangible underlying asset or utility further contributed to the lack of investor confidence.
The idea of a “coin for every family member” was met with a mixture of amusement and outrage. The potential for this strategy to become a recurring money-making scheme for the Trump family only solidified the perception of it as a deeply cynical and exploitative operation. This repetitive cycle, coupled with the easily duped investors, could be a long-term money generator, regardless of the individual coin failures.
The comparison to Venezuela’s economic woes, stemming from mismanagement and corruption, underscores the gravity of concerns about the potential impact of such ventures on the broader financial landscape. The potential for this behavior to destabilize the economy or facilitate illicit financial activities cannot be ignored. The comments highlighted concerns that such actions are weakening the American financial system and could facilitate corrupt activity on an international level.
The entire episode highlights a disturbing trend of leveraging public figures and their influence to profit from speculative investments. The lack of regulation in the cryptocurrency space makes it particularly vulnerable to such exploitation, leaving investors exposed to significant losses. Many viewed the situation as a consequence of a flawed regulatory system that enables such behavior. This is further complicated by the influence and political power the Trump family wields.
The comments uniformly express a lack of sympathy for those who lost money in the crash. The widespread belief is that anyone investing in such a clearly speculative and high-risk venture did so at their own peril. The inherent risk associated with meme coins, combined with the questionable nature of the Trump family’s involvement, made the loss of investment predictable.
It’s likely that this is far from over. The Trump family’s history of engaging in controversial financial practices suggests that they may continue to launch new cryptocurrencies, hoping to exploit the same gullible investors who lost money in previous schemes. The comments suggest an expectation of further attempts to capitalize on the vulnerability of investors, with the expectation that the same cycle will repeat. The continuous generation of coins allows for continuous money laundering, as the process continuously repeats.
In conclusion, the crash of Trump’s meme coin after Melania’s cryptocurrency launch is a stark reminder of the risks inherent in the volatile world of meme coins and the importance of exercising caution before investing in such ventures, especially those associated with highly controversial individuals and families. The entire affair reveals a fundamental distrust in the involved parties, the crypto market’s lack of regulation, and a systemic vulnerability that allows for such activity to continue unabated.