By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Mark Zuckerberg’s recent embrace of MAGA rhetoric and image coincides with Meta’s decision to drastically loosen content moderation policies, prioritizing the spread of disinformation. This shift, coupled with Zuckerberg’s public statements praising “masculine energy” and criticizing corporate inclusivity, is viewed as an attack on workplace diversity and employee well-being. This aligns with a broader trend among tech billionaires who seemingly resent their employees, viewing initiatives aimed at improving workplace culture as “woke” and ultimately detrimental to their bottom line. The resulting authoritarian internal environment at Meta, characterized by secrecy and disregard for employee feedback, further exemplifies this growing hostility towards the workforce. Ultimately, this antagonism towards middle-class workers benefits oligarchs at the expense of both employees and broader societal well-being.
Read the original article here
The tech billionaire war on “woke” isn’t some abstract cultural battle; it’s a direct assault on the rights and livelihoods of workers. This carefully crafted narrative, disguised as a fight for free speech and against “political correctness,” serves to distract from the very real power imbalance at play.
The language itself—terms like “woke”—has been deliberately weaponized. It’s become a catch-all phrase to shut down any criticism of the status quo, any push for greater equity, or any demand for better working conditions. It’s a convenient label to dismiss legitimate concerns as frivolous or overly sensitive.
This “war on woke” is particularly insidious because it effectively pits workers against each other. By focusing on divisive identity politics, the narrative successfully diverts attention from the shared struggles faced by all workers, regardless of race, gender, or sexual orientation, against the overwhelming power of corporate interests.
The very real financial anxieties of many workers are exploited to fuel this manufactured conflict. Economic insecurity makes people vulnerable to narratives that scapegoat others instead of addressing systemic issues. This creates a situation where individuals fighting for better wages or working conditions are labeled as “woke” and therefore part of the problem.
This strategy is particularly effective within the tech industry itself, where a culture of intense competition and individualism already exists. The narrative of “woke” being detrimental to the business bottom line provides an easy excuse to suppress dissent and justify policies that harm workers’ rights. It allows companies to cut costs, weaken worker protections, and stifle any attempts at organizing.
The rhetoric is often framed in the language of individual liberty and freedom of speech, conveniently ignoring the vast economic disparity that prevents true equality of opportunity. The implication is that any attempt to address social and economic inequalities is somehow an infringement on individual rights, conveniently ignoring the fact that systemic inequalities inherently limit freedom and opportunity for many.
The idea that “woke” policies hurt the bottom line is routinely advanced, yet often lacks concrete evidence. Frequently, the actual financial motivations for these actions are far more straightforward and self-serving—increased profits, reduced labor costs, and weakened employee power.
Consider the irony: the very billionaires leading this “anti-woke” crusade are often the ones benefiting most from systems that perpetuate inequality. Their wealth and power are directly tied to the exploitation of workers, and the “war on woke” serves as a potent distraction from this reality.
Ultimately, the “war on woke” is about control. It’s about maintaining the power structure that benefits those at the top, while simultaneously silencing and dividing those at the bottom. It’s a cynical ploy to maintain a system where the wealthy get richer while ordinary workers struggle to make ends meet.
This manufactured culture war masks a far more fundamental conflict: the enduring class struggle between those who hold immense wealth and power and those who labor to sustain that power. The narrative is carefully constructed to mask the underlying reality of who truly benefits from the status quo.
In reality, the “woke” agenda, however loosely defined, often reflects workers’ legitimate desires for better treatment, safer working conditions, and more inclusive workplaces. The framing of these desires as a threat to the free market is nothing more than a convenient smokescreen used to maintain an unfair and unjust system. The true conflict is not between “woke” and “anti-woke”, but between the powerful and the powerless.
For centuries, the balance of power has favored those at the top. This time, however, the manipulative tactics employed are more sophisticated, leveraging social and cultural anxieties to divide and conquer. The reality is starkly simple: those who control the narrative control the outcome. And for now, the narrative is clearly favoring those with the most to gain from maintaining the status quo.
The current climate fosters a culture of fear, preventing open discussion and critical analysis of the true motives behind the attack on “wokeness.” This silencing effect reinforces the power of those who profit from inequality and keeps the focus on manufactured outrage rather than the underlying economic injustices. The war on “woke” is nothing more than a smokescreen for a long-standing battle—the war on workers.