By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s new government has reportedly terminated the 2017 agreement granting Russia a 49-year lease on the Tartus port, demanding the immediate withdrawal of Russian forces. This action also reverses the revenue-sharing arrangement, with Syria now retaining all profits from the port. The Syrian government also implemented import bans on goods from Russia, Iran, and Israel. Moscow has yet to officially respond to these significant developments.
Read the original article here
Syria’s termination of the Russian naval base deal marks a significant turning point in the geopolitical landscape, dramatically altering Russia’s Mediterranean presence and raising questions about its broader global influence. The loss of this strategic asset, achieved without a direct military confrontation, represents a considerable blow to Russia, highlighting the weakening of its international standing following the invasion of Ukraine.
This unexpected development underscores the far-reaching consequences of Putin’s actions in Ukraine. The conflict has not only hampered Russia’s military capabilities within Europe but has also seemingly weakened its position in other regions, including the Middle East. The ease with which Syria seemingly revoked the base agreement suggests a shift in the power dynamic, indicating a decline in Russia’s ability to exert its influence effectively.
The implications for Russia’s navy are substantial. The loss of a key Mediterranean port significantly limits Russia’s naval projection capabilities, particularly affecting its ability to support operations in Africa and the Middle East. The logistical challenges of relocating personnel and equipment, potentially to Libya, raise concerns about the long-term sustainability of Russia’s naval presence in these regions. The reported difficulties in refueling and supplying the remaining vessels only further emphasizes these limitations.
Beyond the immediate naval impact, this event raises concerns about the viability of Russia’s global military strategy. The significant investment in the Syrian base, now rendered useless, represents a considerable loss of resources and strategic planning. The decision highlights a possible erosion of trust among Russia’s allies in the Middle East and Africa, who might reconsider their reliance on a partner demonstrating diminished capabilities and influence.
The geopolitical ramifications extend beyond just Russia’s naval capabilities. The loss of the Syrian base could embolden Russia’s adversaries, while potentially weakening its ability to support its allies and proxies in Africa, potentially leading to instability in those regions. The implications for regional powers like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar remain to be seen, but a power vacuum is likely to emerge, potentially leading to increased competition and shifting alliances.
Furthermore, the incident highlights the long-term consequences of Russia’s actions in Syria. The massive military intervention, involving tens of thousands of Russian soldiers and substantial financial aid, ultimately failed to secure a lasting foothold. The decision by Syria suggests a souring of the relationship with the Assad regime, highlighting the limitations of military power in achieving long-term political objectives, particularly in the face of sustained opposition and war crimes. The potential for future conflicts and instability in the region due to the power shift cannot be overlooked.
The narrative surrounding this event also reflects broader questions about Russia’s strategic miscalculations. The costly investment in Syria, alongside the invasion of Ukraine, seems to have significantly depleted Russia’s resources and undermined its global standing. The focus on maintaining a vast military presence across numerous borders, rather than focusing on strategic alliances and economic cooperation, appears to have been a significant factor in Russia’s current predicament.
The future holds considerable uncertainty, with several scenarios potentially unfolding. Syria’s actions may encourage other countries to re-evaluate their relationships with Russia, while further straining Russia’s already strained economy. The situation could lead to increased tension in the region and a greater involvement of other global players, potentially exacerbating existing conflicts or creating new ones.
Ultimately, the termination of the Russian naval base deal in Syria stands as a symbolic moment, representing a significant setback for Russia’s ambitions and highlighting the complex interplay of military power, geopolitical strategy, and the long-term consequences of conflict. The impact will likely be felt for years to come, with cascading effects across multiple regions and international relations.