By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Syria’s newly installed government has enacted a sweeping ban on goods from Russia, Iran, and Israel, effective January 17th. All affected goods found at border crossings will be seized. This action follows a recent restriction on entry for citizens of Iran and Israel and comes amid burgeoning ties between Syria and Ukraine, which recently sent its first official delegation in years. The ban’s impact on regional stability and trade remains to be seen.
Read the original article here
Syria’s recent ban on goods from Russia, Iran, and Israel is a significant development, raising many questions about the country’s future relations with these key players. The inclusion of Russia in this ban is particularly noteworthy, suggesting a potential shift in the geopolitical landscape of the region. It’s a bold move that could signal the beginning of the end of Russia’s military presence in Syria. The hope is that this ban will lead to Russia being completely removed from its bases within Syrian territory, a long-sought goal for many.
The surprising exclusion of Turkey from this ban is a concerning factor. This omission does not bode well for the Kurds, who have been relying on Turkey’s influence for support and protection. It highlights a complex web of alliances and rivalries that continue to shape Syria’s internal politics and its foreign relations.
While the ban on goods from Russia and Iran might seem unsurprising to some, given their historical support for the Assad regime, it’s crucial to understand the context. For many years, Russia and Iran provided crucial military support to the Assad regime against rebel groups. Now that the rebels are in control, this decision underscores the changed circumstances and the new power dynamics.
The ban on Israeli goods, while perhaps not entirely surprising given the long-standing conflict between Syria and Israel, also reflects the tensions and challenges faced in the region. For some, increased trade with Israel is seen as crucial for building a robust economy in Syria, similar to the success of Jordan. However, this perspective is at odds with the existing animosity and the historical context of the conflict between the two nations.
The current situation reflects the end of a particular phase in Syrian history – what many may have perceived as a ‘honeymoon’ period. The new leadership’s decisions suggest a determined effort to forge its own path, free from the influence of its former allies. This ban seems to be part of a larger strategy to assert sovereignty and control over its internal affairs.
Claims about the Syrian revolution being “anti-fascist” are met with considerable skepticism. Many argue that the current ruling factions have far from proven themselves to be advocates for freedom and democracy. The ban on goods, while a move to assert independence, doesn’t automatically qualify the new government as champions of anti-fascist ideals. The simplistic view of the situation overlooks the complexities and nuances of the power dynamics and the various actors involved.
The relationship between Syria and Israel remains extremely fraught, and the ban on Israeli products reflects this long-standing conflict. The repeated bombing of Assad government forces and infrastructure, along with incidents like the alleged pager supply chain sabotage, significantly strained the relationship and fueled the continuing tension. Peace talks between the two countries are seemingly improbable, and a lasting peace remains elusive, dependent upon the resolution of long-standing territorial disputes. The current Syrian government’s stance on peace with Israel may be seen as a negotiation tactic, rather than a genuine desire for immediate reconciliation.
Despite the hope for peace, the situation remains volatile and highly unpredictable. The Syrian government’s current actions, including the ban on goods from Russia, Iran, and Israel, represent a significant turning point, highlighting the evolving dynamics in the region and indicating a new phase of uncertainty in Syria’s relationships with its neighbors and former allies. The relocation of Russian assets from Syria to other locations, like Libya, showcases Russia’s attempts to maintain its regional influence despite the setbacks it’s facing. However, even these attempts are met with challenges, particularly in the face of the instability that continues to plague Libya and its proximity to NATO forces. The long-term implications of these moves are yet to unfold. The situation is complex, multi-layered, and fraught with uncertainty, making future predictions a perilous undertaking.