By John Q. Hosedrinker A recent study in JAMA Pediatrics reveals a concerning post-Dobbs decision increase in infant mortality rates, particularly among infants with congenital anomalies. This rise, showing a 7% overall increase and a 10% increase in anomaly-related deaths, is attributed to abortion bans preventing terminations of pregnancies with fatal fetal conditions. The study analyzed national CDC data from 2018-2023, highlighting spikes in infant deaths in specific months following the Supreme Court ruling. These findings directly contradict claims that abortion bans protect infant lives, instead demonstrating a tragic and foreseeable consequence of restricted reproductive healthcare access.
Read the original article here
Infant deaths have demonstrably increased since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, directly contradicting the claims of those who championed stricter abortion laws. This rise in infant mortality is not a matter of speculation, but a tragic reality unfolding across states with severely restrictive abortion access.
The assertion that restricting abortion leads to fewer infant deaths is simply untrue. Evidence suggests the opposite: a clear correlation exists between the tightening of abortion laws and a subsequent increase in infant mortality rates. This is likely due to several factors, including the forced carrying of pregnancies to term, even in cases of severe fetal abnormalities or life-threatening conditions for the mother.
Many pregnancies that would have previously been terminated due to medical necessity are now carried to term, resulting in the birth of infants with extremely limited chances of survival. These infants often endure significant suffering before passing away, highlighting the devastating human cost of these restrictive laws. Moreover, the increase in births, particularly those considered high-risk, strains already overstretched healthcare systems, potentially leading to inadequate care for both mothers and infants.
The increase in maternal mortality is another critical factor linked to these stricter abortion laws. When access to safe and legal abortion is limited or non-existent, women are forced to seek out unsafe alternatives, putting their lives at severe risk. This results in more maternal deaths, further contributing to a grim increase in the overall number of deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth.
The argument that these increased infant deaths are simply the result of a higher number of births is a facile one. While it’s true that more births may statistically increase overall infant mortality, the sharp uptick observed directly correlates with the implementation of restrictive abortion laws. This suggests a causal relationship, far beyond a simple increase in numbers.
The focus on controlling women’s bodies, rather than ensuring the well-being of both mothers and children, is a disturbing trend revealed by these statistics. The narrative that prioritizing the life of a fetus is intrinsically pro-life is demonstrably false when examining the aftermath of Roe v. Wade’s overturning. The consequences have shown that these restrictive laws do not, in fact, save lives; they take them.
It’s important to emphasize that this is not a matter of opinion, but a direct consequence of policy decisions. The readily available data clearly demonstrates a rise in infant deaths subsequent to the implementation of stricter abortion laws. This data should be seriously considered when evaluating the effectiveness and morality of these policies.
It’s also worth noting the alarming trends toward suppressing data related to maternal and infant mortality in some states. The deliberate obfuscation of this data further underscores a willingness to ignore the devastating consequences of these laws, raising serious ethical and political concerns. These actions suggest a concerted effort not just to restrict access to abortion, but also to actively hide the resulting increased death toll.
The tragic reality is that many infants are now born into situations where their survival is highly unlikely, due to factors ranging from severe health conditions to the lack of adequate postnatal care. This situation is avoidable. It’s a direct result of policy choices that prioritize ideological agendas over the lives and well-being of both women and infants.
The notion that this increase in infant mortality was somehow unforeseen is patently false. Experts and advocates alike warned repeatedly of this potential consequence. The predictable outcome confirms that the primary motive behind these laws wasn’t the protection of life, but rather the control of women’s reproductive rights. The resulting surge in infant deaths is a stark and unavoidable consequence of this policy choice.
Ultimately, the increased infant mortality rates following the fall of Roe v. Wade expose the inherent fallacy in the arguments for stricter abortion laws. The reality is far removed from the rhetoric. These laws are not pro-life, but pro-control, and the devastating consequences are undeniable. The numbers speak for themselves: stricter abortion laws have demonstrably led to a surge in infant deaths, a tragic outcome that underscores the urgent need for a reevaluation of these policies.