By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Through a 2021 Congressional act granting temporary access, the Treasury’s Bureau of Fiscal Service has already recovered over $31 million in improper Social Security payments made to deceased individuals using the SSA’s Full Death Master File. This initiative, projected to recover over $215 million by 2026, demonstrates significant progress in combating fraud and waste within the Social Security system. The Treasury advocates for permanent access to the file to further enhance program integrity and safeguard taxpayer funds. The incoming administration’s stance on continuing this effort remains unclear.
Read the original article here
The US government recently recovered $31 million in Social Security payments mistakenly sent to deceased individuals. This recovery highlights a systemic issue within a massive program, but the amount recovered is surprisingly small in the context of the overall Social Security budget.
The process of recovering these funds is relatively straightforward in many cases. Often, a deceased recipient receives a full month’s payment even though they died earlier in the month. The government then reclaims the portion of the payment not earned. This isn’t generally considered fraud, but rather an administrative oversight.
The scale of improper payments within Social Security is substantial. Annual improper payments are estimated to be in the billions of dollars, dwarfing the $31 million recovered in this specific instance. The sheer volume of payments processed annually, totaling over $1 trillion, makes perfect accuracy almost impossible.
Many commenters questioned the cost-effectiveness of recovering such a relatively small sum. The resources expended to retrieve $31 million might easily exceed the amount recouped. This raises legitimate concerns about the allocation of resources and priorities within government agencies. One commenter even suggested that the cost of recovery could outweigh the benefit, leaving the question of whether this effort was genuinely worthwhile.
The relatively low figure of $31 million is further contextualized by the larger problem of improper payments. The fact that this recovery represents such a small fraction of the total improper payments suggests a need for more comprehensive and efficient systems for preventing these errors in the first place. Improving the system to proactively prevent improper payments might be more cost-effective in the long run than actively recovering the relatively small amounts involved.
Some individuals raised concerns about the potential for abuse. The possibility of families concealing a death to continue receiving payments was mentioned. However, the focus of the $31 million recovery seems to be more on the administrative overpayments than outright fraudulent schemes. This points to a system that, while prone to errors, is not necessarily riddled with widespread intentional deception.
The comparison to other financial irregularities within the government is stark. The comparatively small sum recovered pales in comparison to the potential losses resulting from massive government programs, such as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which witnessed significant instances of fraud and abuse.
There is a clear contrast between the focus on recovering relatively small sums from deceased recipients and the far larger amounts potentially lost through other channels. This raises questions about priorities and the allocation of resources to combat financial malfeasance within the government. The disproportionate attention given to a small recovery, in light of far greater potential losses from other sources, highlights a deeper issue about accountability and resource allocation.
The overall picture suggests a need for significant improvements in the efficiency and accuracy of Social Security payment systems. While recovering funds from deceased individuals might seem like a worthwhile endeavor, its effectiveness is questionable given the context of far larger amounts lost through other means. Improving the underlying systems to prevent such errors could be a more efficient and effective use of resources than focusing on recovering relatively small amounts from administrative oversights. The case of the $31 million recovery should serve as a starting point for a broader discussion on streamlining processes and improving the integrity of the Social Security system. The amount, while significant on its own, is ultimately insignificant relative to the overall scale of the program and the potential for other forms of financial loss.