By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SZRU) reports that Russia has deployed 140,000-180,000 convicts to fight in Ukraine since summer 2022, a recruitment effort initially managed by the Wagner Group and later by the Ministry of Defense. This recruitment significantly reduced Russia’s prison population, now estimated at 300,000-350,000, compared to 2014’s numbers. The recent elimination of a one-time payment to these prisoners indicates worsening economic conditions in Russia. Despite initial promises, these convicts receive significantly lower pay and fewer benefits than regular Russian soldiers, and some have re-offended upon their return.
Read the original article here
Russia has recruited up to 180,000 convicts to fight in its war against Ukraine, according to Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SZRU). This staggering figure, reported in early January 2025, highlights the extent to which Russia has relied on prison populations to bolster its military forces. The recruitment, initiated in the summer of 2022, initially involved the Wagner mercenary group before shifting to direct recruitment by the Russian Ministry of Defense.
Russia has been drawing upon its prison population, estimated to be around 300,000-350,000 in 2024 (half the number in 2014), to supplement its troops. The Ukraine-Russia war is cited as the primary reason for this reduction in the prison population. The decision to utilize convicts in this way undoubtedly presents significant strategic and ethical challenges.
The recruitment of convicts reveals a deepening crisis within Russia. The abolishment of a one-time payment of $3,524 for convicts signing contracts with the Ministry of Defense, effective January 1, 2025, strongly indicates financial strain on the Russian economy. Further compounding the situation, prisoners and their families are now deprived of payments and benefits received by other volunteer soldiers, and their salaries are significantly lower than those of regular Russian soldiers, ranging from two to four times less. This suggests that Russia is increasingly resorting to desperate measures, prioritizing cost-cutting over equitable treatment of its recruits.
The consequences of utilizing convicts extend beyond the battlefield. Reports indicate that dozens of convicts, after serving their time in Ukraine, returned to Russia only to be accused of new crimes. This paradoxical outcome raises serious concerns about the reliability and potential for recidivism among these individuals. It also highlights the potential for a vicious cycle where convicts are essentially used as disposable combat assets. The sheer scale of convict recruitment—up to 180,000 individuals—is alarming.
The implications of this massive recruitment drive are far-reaching. The influx of convicts as soldiers could potentially destabilize Russia’s domestic security. Given their backgrounds, these convicts present unpredictable variables on the frontlines. While Russia might view them as expendable assets, the long-term ramifications of releasing convicts with combat experience back into Russian society, some having potentially committed further crimes during or after their service, remain a considerable risk.
The strategic impact of employing convicts is equally concerning. While they provide a readily available pool of manpower, their effectiveness and loyalty remain questionable. The lack of adequate training and motivation could result in high casualty rates. While the sheer number could overwhelm Ukrainian defenses momentarily, it’s unlikely to lead to a decisive military victory given the significant disparity in quality between trained soldiers and convicts. This strategy seems indicative of a desperate attempt to overcome a critical shortage of trained and motivated troops.
The use of convicts in the war effort underscores the dire situation facing Russia. The financial pressures, the diminishing pool of willing soldiers, and the willingness to deploy individuals with high recidivism rates suggest that Russia is grappling with a significant military and economic crisis. The long-term repercussions of this strategy, both for Russia and for the international community, remain to be seen. The strategy raises ethical questions about the treatment of prisoners of war and the use of inherently vulnerable individuals as expendable cannon fodder. The focus on quantity over quality raises serious doubts about the viability of Russia’s military strategy in the long run.