By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A joint investigation by The Insider and Der Spiegel reveals that the Russian GRU, between 2016 and 2019, allegedly paid Taliban and other militant groups up to $200,000 per US/coalition soldier killed, totaling an estimated $30 million. The scheme utilized a network of Afghan couriers, operating under the guise of a gemstone trading company, to distribute funds coordinated by GRU officers like Alexey Arkhipov and overseen by Lieutenant General Ivan Kasyanenko. Key figures such as Rahmatullah Azizi, a central operative, relocated to Russia after the operation’s exposure. These payments fueled attacks against coalition forces, with the investigation highlighting hindered official inquiries and US reluctance to acknowledge the program’s existence.
Read the original article here
Russian intelligence allegedly paid Taliban fighters substantial sums of money, up to $200,000 per attack, to target US forces in Afghanistan. This revelation, building upon earlier reports from 2020, paints a disturbing picture of potential Russian interference in the conflict. The new investigation provides further details, reinforcing the gravity of the situation and raising serious questions about accountability.
The scale of the alleged payments is striking; $200,000 per attack represents a significant investment in undermining the US military effort. This suggests a deliberate and well-funded campaign designed to prolong the war and destabilize the region, serving Russia’s geopolitical interests. The sheer amount involved also points to a considerable level of organization and planning within Russian intelligence.
Reports highlight a key figure, Rahmatullah Azizi, acting as a middleman in the alleged transactions. Azizi allegedly received hundreds of thousands of dollars from Russia, then distributed the funds to Taliban-linked militants. This intricate network underscores the sophistication of the alleged operation. The system ensured plausible deniability while effectively channeling funds to achieve their stated goal.
These findings recall previous reports dating back to 2020. The initial reports, citing intercepted financial transactions, initially sparked intense debate and controversy. The Trump administration, at the time, dismissed the allegations as “fake news,” sparking further political turmoil. The administration’s response was met with skepticism, leading to accusations of downplaying a serious national security threat. The current investigation seems to corroborate those earlier findings, adding layers of detail and solidifying the claims.
The difference between the current findings and the 2020 reports lies in the level of detail and substantiation. While the 2020 reports relied on intercepted intelligence, the current investigation likely builds upon that foundation, incorporating additional evidence and investigative work to further solidify their claims. This provides a much stronger case, with the added detail serving to bolster previous claims. The sheer audacity and blatant nature of the alleged payments raise questions as to the overall intentions.
The alleged actions raise fundamental questions about the motivations behind Russia’s involvement. The goal was likely to prolong the US military presence in Afghanistan, draining resources and political will. This could potentially have served as a means of weakening the United States, both militarily and economically. A protracted conflict would inevitably sap American strength and influence on the global stage.
The controversy surrounding the 2020 reports extended beyond simple disagreements over intelligence assessments. It became deeply entangled in partisan politics, fueling a fierce debate over the integrity of the US intelligence community. The political ramifications were profound, significantly impacting public trust and confidence in government institutions. This controversy highlights how easily such crucial national security matters can be politicized and subsequently downplayed.
Furthermore, the reported lack of action following the initial reports raises significant concerns about accountability. The failure to fully investigate and address these allegations earlier could have had far-reaching consequences. This potential lapse in oversight represents a significant failure in the defense of American interests and raises concerns about the effectiveness of checks and balances within the government. The lack of public accountability allows for an environment wherein similar actions can be attempted without fear of reprisal.
The new investigation, therefore, is crucial for several reasons. First, it confirms and expands upon the initial reports, providing more concrete evidence of Russian involvement. Second, it highlights the need for transparency and accountability in handling such sensitive national security issues. Finally, it emphasizes the ongoing threat posed by Russian interference in global conflicts. The implications of such actions are wide-ranging and far-reaching.
The revelation underscores a disturbing reality – a major world power potentially actively funding attacks against US forces. The scale of the alleged payments, the intricate network involved, and the political fallout surrounding the earlier reports paint a complex and concerning picture of Russian actions. This necessitates a renewed focus on counter-intelligence efforts and a commitment to holding those responsible accountable. The long-term implications demand attention and a concerted effort towards increased security.