By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Verified drone footage and multiple sources reveal that Russia is deploying injured soldiers, many requiring crutches, into front-line combat near Pokrovsk. These “crutch battalions,” part of the 20th Combined Arms Army, are used in infantry assaults deemed more effective than mechanized operations despite incurring heavy casualties from Ukrainian drone strikes. This practice underscores Russia’s severe manpower shortage and inability to replace combat losses, which reportedly reached 434,000 in 2024 alone, according to Ukrainian General Oleksandr Syrskyi. The Kremlin’s increasing reliance on visibly wounded soldiers highlights the failing regeneration of combat-effective units.
Read the original article here
The Russian military’s deployment of injured soldiers into what are being called “crutch battalions” speaks volumes about the deepening manpower crisis within its ranks. This isn’t merely a strategic blunder; it’s a desperate, almost macabre, measure reflecting a severe shortage of able-bodied troops.
The image of soldiers, burdened by injuries and relying on crutches, being sent back into combat is jarring. It evokes historical parallels, reminiscent of wartime desperation where armies, facing insurmountable losses, were forced to utilize any available personnel, regardless of physical limitations. This recalls narratives of similar practices employed by other militaries during periods of extreme manpower strain, highlighting the grim realities faced by nations locked in prolonged conflicts.
Some reports suggest that these injured soldiers aren’t just thrown into the front lines. Instead, a new, twisted role is emerging: human mules. Imagine the scene: wounded soldiers, burdened with heavy packs of supplies, trudging forward. Their role is to carry essential resources, freeing up healthier soldiers for more direct combat. The callous logic seems to be that if these injured soldiers are killed, the supplies are readily available to those who follow. This macabre efficiency prioritizes resource transport over the lives of already vulnerable individuals.
The strategy, while ruthless and arguably inhumane, might be seen as a desperate attempt at mitigating losses. A wounded soldier, unable to effectively fight on the front lines, can still contribute – albeit at great personal risk – by carrying vital supplies. The tactic minimizes exposure to drone strikes and other dangers for the more physically fit combatants while maintaining the flow of crucial resources to the front. Yet, its fundamental premise is disturbing – it treats human life as expendable and readily replaceable.
The reported formation of these units underscores the severe personnel challenges facing the Russian military. The sheer scale of casualties has apparently driven them to this extreme measure. It begs the question: if the Russian military is resorting to deploying the wounded, how dire is the situation truly?
Beyond the manpower crisis, this tactic likely reflects logistical issues. The necessity of using injured soldiers as human pack animals hints at potential problems with supply lines and logistical support. This reinforces the notion that the Russian military is struggling to effectively supply its troops in the field. The reliance on such makeshift methods suggests a breakdown of conventional supply lines and support systems.
Moreover, it raises serious ethical and practical questions about the cost-benefit analysis involved in deploying wounded soldiers. The long-term costs of providing lifelong pensions and care for those further injured or killed in these crutch battalions are likely to be substantial, potentially outweighing any short-term gains in battlefield efficiency. The financial strain on the Russian government, combined with the loss of life, underlines the unsustainable nature of this strategy.
The very existence of “crutch battalions” is not just indicative of a manpower crisis. It symbolizes a broader failure in strategic planning, logistical support, and perhaps more troublingly, a profound disregard for human life within the Russian military command. This inhumane tactic casts a dark light on the war’s human cost, highlighting the suffering and sacrifices imposed on the Russian soldiers themselves, regardless of their physical condition or capacity to effectively fight. It represents a low point, not just in military tactics, but in basic human decency.