By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Michael Kenyon filed a $15.5 million claim against the city of Phoenix, alleging that Phoenix police officers caused him severe third-degree burns by pinning him to scorching hot pavement for over four minutes on July 6, 2024. The claim cites a lack of officer training and unconstitutional practices, aligning with findings from a recent Department of Justice investigation. Kenyon’s injuries, which include missing flesh, resulted in over a month of hospitalization. The city is conducting an internal investigation, but has yet to release body camera footage.
Read the original article here
A Phoenix man is suing the Phoenix Police Department for $15 million after he claims he was subjected to what amounts to torture during an arrest. The incident allegedly involved being forced to lie face down on scorching asphalt for four minutes in 114-degree Fahrenheit (45.5 Celsius) weather. This extreme heat exposure, the lawsuit argues, constitutes a violation of his basic human rights.
The sheer brutality of the situation is difficult to ignore. Imagine the searing pain of skin against superheated pavement under a relentless sun. The image alone paints a picture of egregious police misconduct, raising serious questions about the training and practices within the Phoenix Police Department. The argument that this constitutes medieval-style torture isn’t hyperbole; the description itself paints a stark picture of inhumane treatment.
The lawsuit’s claim of a lack of training, unconstitutional practices, and a violent culture within the department aligns with a scathing Department of Justice investigation released earlier this year. This investigation further highlights a pattern of misconduct within the force, raising concerns about systemic issues rather than isolated incidents. The sheer volume of documented incidents suggests a deeper problem than simple inadequate training.
The potential defense arguments from the Phoenix PD seem weak at best, given the indisputable severity of the alleged actions. Regardless of the suspect’s guilt or innocence, subjecting any individual to such extreme conditions is unacceptable and a clear violation of established human rights standards. Even a guilty verdict wouldn’t justify the kind of extreme treatment allegedly inflicted.
This case highlights a larger issue of accountability within law enforcement. The current system, with its layers of qualified immunity and the potential for taxpayer-funded settlements, appears to incentivize improper behavior and discourage genuine reform. Many believe that personal liability insurance for officers, similar to systems in other professions, could provide a more effective deterrent against misconduct.
Concerns have been raised about the lack of immediate action to alleviate the man’s suffering. Even if the initial apprehension was justified, the failure to provide immediate assistance once the severity of the situation became apparent is deeply troubling. The image of officers standing by while a man suffers from severe heat exposure is deeply disturbing and suggests a complete disregard for human life.
Calls for major systemic changes are not unfounded. The $15 million lawsuit could be viewed as a necessary step towards achieving much-needed accountability and reform within the Phoenix Police Department. Some believe the figure, while significant, is not enough to reflect the depth of the suffering and the systemic issues the lawsuit seeks to address. Further, the lack of sufficient accountability mechanisms allows for a pattern of impunity, enabling repeated instances of abuse.
The incident brings to mind other cases of police brutality and excessive force, highlighting the need for broader reform. There are numerous examples of similar issues throughout the country, and many people are urging for drastic changes, ranging from improved training to complete overhauls of the system of qualified immunity. The idea that police should be held personally liable for their actions, through insurance or other means, is gaining traction.
Some argue that merely improving training won’t solve the underlying problem of a potentially ingrained culture of aggression and disregard for human rights. A more comprehensive approach, including substantial policy changes and improved oversight, is needed to ensure lasting reform and prevent future instances of this kind of alleged abuse. Ultimately, until fundamental changes are made, similar incidents are likely to continue.
The lack of trust between police and citizens is a serious concern, and this case is a stark reminder of the urgent need for improved community relations. The event highlights how easily mistakes can escalate into grave human rights violations in a system that appears, at least in this specific instance, to fail to offer sufficient safeguards for those in custody. The lawsuit could spark a much-needed conversation about how to improve the justice system and create a more equitable and just society.