David Axelrod’s assessment that Donald Trump learned during his previous term that he could “get away with anything” rings profoundly true. It’s a chilling realization, but one supported by a multitude of observations from the past several years. His actions, or rather, his lack of consequences for his actions, suggest a deeply ingrained belief that the rules simply don’t apply to him.
This wasn’t a sudden realization born from his time in office; it’s more accurately described as a confirmation of a pre-existing belief. His past behaviors, even before his presidential campaign, displayed a consistent pattern of disregard for norms and conventions.… Continue reading
President Trump’s first day back in office saw him sign numerous executive orders, a significant portion of which directly mirrored proposals from the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. This policy blueprint, previously distanced from by Trump, includes actions such as withdrawing from international agreements and boosting domestic oil production. The implementation of Project 2025 highlights the influence of conservative think tanks and their corporate backing in shaping the administration’s agenda. With Republican control of Congress, this conservative agenda will likely be swiftly enacted.
Read More
Trump’s expected redesignation of Yemen’s Houthis as a terror organization is generating considerable discussion, and understandably so. The issue is complex, with differing opinions stemming from a range of perspectives and understandings of the situation. The potential for such a designation to significantly impact the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Yemen is a major concern.
The move itself wouldn’t be unprecedented. The Houthis have been previously designated as a terrorist organization, and then later removed from that list. The reasoning behind these shifts involves navigating the difficult balance between combating terrorism and ensuring the delivery of crucial humanitarian aid to a population already suffering tremendously.… Continue reading
OpenAI and SoftBank will spearhead a $100 billion private investment in American AI infrastructure, a project championed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman as crucial for national re-industrialization and job creation. This initiative, termed “Stargate,” aims to significantly bolster the nation’s digital capabilities. However, Elon Musk’s recent actions, potentially jeopardizing the project’s success, highlight the complex and potentially volatile relationship between key players. Analysts suggest this dynamic mirrors past power struggles, raising concerns about the long-term stability of the partnership.
Read More
In response to concerns about the erosion of democracy, the politician advocated for stronger EU regulations on social media companies. His proposals include combating disinformation through user verification and leveraging the Digital Services Act to hold platform owners accountable for societal harm caused by their algorithms. He explicitly linked the concentration of power among tech billionaires to threats against democratic processes, drawing parallels between corporate responsibility and the accountability of social media platforms. This action follows previous accusations against specific tech leaders for their alleged role in supporting extremist ideologies.
Read More
Ocasio-Cortez’s condemnation of Elon Musk’s gesture is a powerful statement against what many perceive as a Nazi salute. The intensity of her reaction highlights the gravity of the situation and underscores the political implications of this seemingly simple hand movement. Her declaration, “I’m not with the Nazis,” firmly positions her against those who might interpret the gesture as anything other than a display of far-right ideology. The forceful rejection serves to counter any attempts to normalize or dismiss the gesture as merely a misinterpreted hand movement.
The controversy surrounding Musk’s action is far from isolated. Many online commentators emphasize the gesture’s resemblance to a Nazi salute, regardless of Musk’s intentions.… Continue reading
The Colorado Supreme Court unanimously rejected a habeas corpus petition filed by the Nonhuman Rights Project (NRP) seeking to move five elephants from Cheyenne Mountain Zoo to a sanctuary. The court affirmed that habeas corpus applies only to persons, and elephants, regardless of their intelligence or emotional complexity, are not considered persons under the law. The zoo had argued the elephants received excellent care, and the court’s decision upheld the lower court’s ruling. The NRP, while expressing disappointment, stated this loss was expected in the ongoing fight for animal rights.
Read More
President Trump issued an executive order withdrawing the US from the OECD’s global minimum corporate tax agreement, threatening Ireland’s significant corporate tax revenue. This action targets countries imposing “extraterritorial” levies on US multinationals, potentially impacting Ireland’s reliance on taxes from US companies headquartered there. The Irish Department of Finance is reviewing the order, while the IDA Ireland emphasizes that taxation is only one factor attracting foreign direct investment. The EU expressed regret over the decision and stated its commitment to the tax reforms, though uncertainty remains regarding potential retaliatory measures and escalating trade disputes.
Read More
The rise of a second Trump presidency is a complex issue, but a significant factor often overlooked is the role of influential YouTubers and podcasters in mobilizing a substantial segment of the male population towards the political right. An analysis of thousands of videos reveals a clear pattern of how this influence operates, subtly yet effectively shaping political views and driving increased voter turnout.
The ease with which viewers can be drawn into this content without initially recognizing the underlying political agenda is concerning. Many platforms subtly push this type of content through algorithms designed to maximize engagement, inadvertently creating a highly effective echo chamber.… Continue reading
Trump freed a Jan. 6 defendant charged with assaulting police. This individual, a two-time convicted felon with a history of violence, had been involved in throwing an explosive device into a Capitol tunnel filled with law enforcement officers. His release, part of a broader pardon granted by Trump, understandably sparked controversy and raised questions about the process and its implications.
The Department of Justice (DOJ), however, seemingly had a different perspective on this defendant’s freedom. Almost immediately following his release on the Jan. 6 charges, the DOJ acted swiftly and decisively. They re-arrested him. The basis for the re-arrest? A separate, unrelated felony gun charge.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker