Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that Donald Trump’s actions to overturn the 2020 election constituted criminal efforts to retain power, including attempts to induce state officials to falsify vote counts and pressure the Vice President. Had Trump not won the 2024 election, the report asserts sufficient evidence existed for a conviction. Trump vehemently denies the findings, attacking Smith’s integrity and alleging the House Select Committee illegally destroyed evidence. Smith, having resigned, defended his investigation’s impartiality and adherence to the law.
Read More
The impeachment trial of South Korea’s President Yoon has been adjourned after he failed to appear. This unprecedented move has sparked a flurry of online commentary, ranging from disbelief to cynical amusement. Many are questioning the seeming ease with which he’s avoided accountability, drawing parallels to other high-profile figures who’ve similarly challenged the legal system. The blatant disregard for the proceedings has left many wondering about the efficacy of South Korea’s legal processes, particularly when dealing with powerful individuals.
The sheer audacity of his absence is striking, fueling a sense of outrage and frustration among those who believe in the rule of law.… Continue reading
In observance of Inauguration Day on January 20th, Governor Kay Ivey has directed that all Alabama state flags, currently at half-staff for President Carter, be raised to full-staff. This action complies with federal law. Flags will return to half-staff on January 21st, continuing the 30-day mourning period for the late president. This follows similar actions by other governors, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott.
Read More
A Russian ‘shadow fleet’ vessel has reportedly been circling a section of the Baltic Pipe pipeline, which transports Norwegian gas to Poland. This concerning development raises serious questions about the security of vital energy infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. The news, initially reported by a source within the Polish Foreign Ministry, immediately sparks a range of reactions, from calls for decisive action to cautious consideration of the environmental implications.
The potential consequences of this action are significant. The vulnerability of underwater pipelines to sabotage is a major concern, highlighting the need for robust security measures. This incident follows previous alleged acts of sabotage attributed to the Russian shadow fleet, including the reported severing of Baltic cables.… Continue reading
Jack Smith’s final report on the January 6th case unequivocally states that his case against Donald Trump was robust enough to secure a conviction. This declaration, while seemingly straightforward, carries significant weight given the intense scrutiny and political polarization surrounding the investigation. It highlights the strength of the evidence gathered and the legal arguments developed by Smith’s team, suggesting a high probability of success had the trial proceeded as planned.
The report’s conclusion directly addresses the central question of whether the prosecution’s case was viable. By stating that it could have “sustained a conviction,” Smith effectively counters any claims that the investigation was weak or lacked sufficient evidence to bring a successful prosecution.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report details President-elect Trump’s incitement of violence on January 6th, 2020, and the dissemination of demonstrably false election fraud claims. The investigation, involving extensive interviews and witness testimony, concluded that Trump knowingly spread false narratives and that sufficient evidence existed for a conviction had he not been re-elected. Trump’s actions, deemed unprecedented in their disruption of a peaceful transfer of power, faced significant challenges due to his influence and the prospect of his presidency. Despite Trump’s attempts to suppress the report, its release concludes this chapter of the investigation into the January 6th attack.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that sufficient evidence existed to convict President-elect Donald Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results, had he not been re-elected in 2024. The Department of Justice report details Trump’s alleged efforts, including spreading false claims of election fraud and inciting violence. Smith’s investigation faced significant challenges, including Trump’s use of social media to influence witnesses and legal proceedings. However, the DOJ’s policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president precluded further action.
Read More
Zelensky says he discussed the idea of Western troops in Ukraine with Macron. This suggests a potential shift in the strategic conversation surrounding the ongoing conflict, moving beyond the current provision of aid and weaponry to the direct deployment of combat forces. The specific context of this deployment isn’t explicitly detailed, but it’s likely framed within the broader discussions around a potential ceasefire agreement or peace treaty, possibly acting as a peacekeeping force to maintain stability during a transition.
The conversation surrounding Western troop deployment immediately brings to mind the significant risks involved. The fear of escalating the conflict into a wider, potentially catastrophic war is very real and understandable.… Continue reading
Danish intelligence alleges a 2019 Russian operation forged a letter from Greenland’s former foreign minister, aiming to instigate a US purchase of Greenland and thereby fracture NATO unity. This fabricated communication, purportedly thanking a US Senator for financial aid and suggesting a Greenlandic independence referendum, seemingly influenced President Trump’s subsequent interest in acquiring the island. Trump’s proposal, met with Danish derision, was ultimately linked by PET to broader Russian Arctic ambitions alongside China. The Kremlin subsequently used Trump’s statements to justify its actions in Ukraine.
Read More
The Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from fossil fuel companies seeking to dismiss a Honolulu lawsuit alleging a decades-long misinformation campaign regarding climate change. This allows the lawsuit, which claims violations of state law including public nuisance and failure to warn, to proceed to trial. The decision is a significant victory for climate accountability lawsuits nationwide, representing the fourth time the Court has rejected similar appeals from the industry. The industry expressed disappointment, while supporters of the lawsuit hailed the decision as a crucial step toward holding fossil fuel companies accountable for their actions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood