By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The New Orleans ISIS-inspired attack highlights a concerning rise in radicalization fueled by readily accessible online extremist communities and heightened political polarization. Law enforcement faces challenges tracking this increasingly fragmented threat, which encompasses various ideologies, including far-right, Islamist, and far-left extremism. While the majority of radicalized individuals do not commit violence, the motivations of those who do often prioritize a desire for significance over specific ideological tenets. Despite increased law enforcement efforts, preventing all attacks remains impossible.
Read the original article here
The current climate is a volatile mix of online extremism and political polarization, creating a dangerous environment ripe for attacks. It’s a perfect storm brewing, fueled by a deep-seated sense of frustration and disillusionment among many. People feel ignored, unheard, and left behind in a system that seems increasingly rigged against them. The lack of opportunity to achieve basic necessities like homeownership, fair wages, and financial security is a significant factor contributing to this widespread unrest.
The feeling of being unheard is a powerful motivator. When individuals believe their voices are ignored by political leaders, employers, and even law enforcement, they are more likely to seek alternative outlets, often leading them down paths of extremism. This sense of powerlessness fuels anger and resentment, creating fertile ground for radical ideologies to take root. The internet, once a source of lighthearted entertainment, has become a battleground for these extreme views, amplifying their reach and impact.
This escalation in extremism isn’t just a matter of internet access; it’s tied to deep societal problems. The extreme wealth inequality and the concentration of power in the hands of a few is a major source of resentment. When a large segment of the population feels that the system is fundamentally unfair and that their concerns are consistently dismissed, the potential for violence increases dramatically. This is especially true when one political party openly courts and supports insurrectionist movements.
The narrative often focuses on the internet as the primary culprit, but that’s a simplification. The internet merely provides a platform; the underlying issues are much deeper. Dismissing the core problems of economic inequality and political disenfranchisement as merely “political divisiveness” ignores the very real grievances fueling extremism. This is not merely about differing political opinions; it’s about a sense of being actively excluded from the promise of the American Dream.
Furthermore, the constant barrage of inflammatory rhetoric from political figures and media outlets only exacerbates the situation. The constant political bickering and the failure of elected officials to address the core problems only deepen the sense of frustration and hopelessness, pushing individuals further toward extremism. This dynamic is further complicated by the perception that certain media outlets selectively focus on and amplify certain types of extremism while ignoring or downplaying others, creating an unbalanced and potentially harmful narrative.
The normalization of violence in political discourse also plays a significant role. When politicians themselves openly threaten violence or endorse extremist views, it sends a dangerous message that violence is an acceptable means of achieving political goals. This normalization of violence creates a culture of fear and distrust, increasing the likelihood of attacks.
The anonymity offered by online platforms further complicates the issue. The ability to spread hateful messages and incite violence without fear of immediate consequences emboldens extremists and allows them to operate with impunity. While some argue that restricting online speech is a dangerous path, the current situation demonstrates the very real dangers of unchecked online extremism.
The problem is not limited to a single ideology. Extremist views span the political spectrum, although the data shows a disproportionate amount of extremist violence is perpetrated by right-wing groups. This requires a multifaceted approach, addressing both the ideological and social factors that contribute to this dangerous trend. Solutions must involve addressing the underlying economic and social inequalities, reforming our political system, and finding ways to mitigate the spread of extremist ideologies online.
The focus shouldn’t solely be on “taking out the baddies”. A proactive approach is needed, addressing the root causes of extremism and building more inclusive and just societies. This includes investing in mental health care, implementing stricter regulations on firearms, promoting critical thinking skills, and fostering open dialogue and understanding. Ignoring the underlying problems will only allow the perfect storm to intensify, resulting in further violence and instability. Ultimately, ignoring the cries for help from those feeling left behind will only serve to fuel the flames of extremism. The solution isn’t just about controlling the flames; it’s about addressing the tinder that feeds them.