By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Governor Newsom’s executive order protects Los Angeles County fire victims from predatory real estate practices by prohibiting undervalue offers on fire-damaged homes for three months. This action, mirroring a similar Hawaii order, targets speculators exploiting vulnerable residents in areas like Altadena, hard-hit by the Eaton Fire. The order directs state agencies to inform the public of their rights and resources, with violations potentially resulting in criminal prosecution. The governor also announced additional measures, including expedited debris removal and a legislative request for $2.5 billion in fire aid.
Read the original article here
Governor Newsom’s recent executive order aims to shield Los Angeles fire victims from exploitative real estate practices. The order is a direct response to concerns that vulnerable residents, already reeling from the devastation of fire, might be pressured into selling their properties at unfairly low prices. This preventative measure acknowledges the significant power imbalance that can exist between distressed homeowners and opportunistic investors following a disaster.
The need for such an order, however, is a subject of debate. Some argue that the inherent market forces, particularly the long-term uncertainties associated with rebuilding after widespread destruction, would naturally deter many large-scale investors. The significant time required for infrastructure repair, the unpredictable return of essential services like schools and grocery stores, and the general uncertainty regarding future community development create substantial risks for developers. Many developers prefer shorter-term investment horizons, making a post-fire property acquisition a less appealing prospect than it might initially seem.
This perspective, though, contrasts with the concerns about the potential for predatory practices. The argument is made that, while long-term uncertainty exists, the sheer value of land in desirable Los Angeles neighborhoods remains incredibly high. Even properties heavily damaged by fire could still hold substantial value based on location alone. High-end areas like Malibu, for instance, retain a considerable allure despite potential risks, making them attractive to investors who can afford to wait out the recovery period. The potential for immense future profit could outweigh the risks for some investors.
The situation in Los Angeles differs significantly from that of Lahaina, Hawaii, where a similar protective law was enacted. While the Hawaiian law may have been largely symbolic, given the extensive damage and uncertainty surrounding Lahaina’s recovery, Los Angeles presents a different scenario. The high value of property in certain Los Angeles neighborhoods, combined with the potential for faster recovery compared to a smaller community like Lahaina, creates a greater potential for exploitation.
Furthermore, the issue of insurance companies plays a significant role. The California insurance market has been grappling with significant challenges, including rising rates and insurers pulling out of the state. This doesn’t stem solely from fire-related losses; rather, it’s part of a broader trend related to profitability and regulatory pressures. Fire losses, however, inevitably exacerbate these issues. The concern is that the insurance companies may simply absorb the fire-related costs into future rate increases, ultimately placing a heavier burden on homeowners. This could indirectly contribute to an environment where homeowners might be more susceptible to selling at below-market value to avoid exorbitant insurance premiums.
Therefore, Governor Newsom’s executive order, although potentially viewed as unnecessary by some, serves as an important safeguard against potential exploitation. The potential for significant profit, combined with the already stressful circumstances faced by fire victims, suggests that active measures are needed to prevent undue pressure and ensure fair transactions in the aftermath of a disaster. While market forces might play a role, the preventative measure aims to level the playing field and protect residents from opportunistic behavior, especially considering the complexities of the insurance market and the inherent time lag in rebuilding after a significant fire. The order acts as a symbolic statement, a sign that the state of California is actively working to protect its citizens and prevent a repetition of past injustices seen after similar events elsewhere.