By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin’s lawsuit challenges the results of North Carolina’s Supreme Court election, where he lost to Justice Allison Riggs by a narrow margin. He seeks to invalidate tens of thousands of votes due to alleged registration irregularities, a move legal experts deem an attempt at mass disenfranchisement. This action, supported by the RNC, is seen as setting a dangerous precedent for future elections, potentially undermining faith in the democratic process. The case is currently before both the state Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, with significant implications for the integrity of elections nationwide.
Read the original article here
Republican efforts to undermine democracy in North Carolina are escalating, creating a deeply troubling trend. This isn’t a new phenomenon; it’s a sustained pattern of actions designed to restrict voting access and challenge election results, even when those results have already been certified. The implications extend far beyond the state’s borders, potentially setting precedents that could be used to influence elections nationwide.
The recent legal challenge to tens of thousands of votes exemplifies this concerning pattern. The challenge centers on a technicality – a missing identifier on voter registration forms – despite the fact that the forms were provided by the state itself. This highlights a deliberate strategy: leveraging minor discrepancies to disenfranchise voters on a massive scale. The argument that this isn’t about winning a single race, but about establishing a precedent for future challenges, underscores a cynical and long-term approach to weakening the democratic process.
This isn’t merely about a single instance; it’s part of a larger pattern of manipulating election rules to favor one party. The strategy involves passing laws that disproportionately impact specific voter demographics, followed by legal challenges that effectively overturn election outcomes. Even when these laws are deemed unconstitutional, they’re often quickly replaced with near-identical versions, demonstrating a persistent commitment to circumventing the democratic will of the people.
Such actions are particularly insidious because they operate below the radar, making it harder for the public to fully grasp the extent of the problem. The long-term goal appears to be to normalize these types of challenges, laying the groundwork for future, more widespread disenfranchisement in critical federal elections. This constant chipping away at democratic norms and institutions is chillingly effective in eroding faith in the electoral process.
The impact extends beyond voter suppression. The repeated redrawing of electoral districts to maintain a Republican supermajority in the state legislature showcases a blatant disregard for fair representation. The fact that this gerrymandering is consistently challenged and overturned, yet consistently repeated, indicates a willingness to defy court rulings and subvert the democratic principle of equal representation. This suggests a strategy built on exploiting legal loopholes and delaying tactics, rather than upholding fair and equitable electoral practices.
Furthermore, the repeated use of North Carolina as a testing ground for restrictive voting laws is particularly alarming. Successfully implementing such laws in one state creates a blueprint that can be replicated in others, potentially leading to a nationwide erosion of democratic principles. This systematic and strategic approach transcends mere partisan politics; it represents a calculated effort to reshape the very foundation of the American democratic system.
One significant hurdle to overcome is widespread public awareness and engagement. Many people simply aren’t aware of the extent of these efforts to suppress the vote, or they dismiss them as mere political maneuvering. This apathy, combined with the spread of misinformation, makes it more challenging to effectively counter these attempts to undermine democracy.
While raising awareness through articles and discussions is crucial, it’s not sufficient. Active engagement in the political process is paramount. This involves not only voting but also actively challenging restrictive laws, supporting organizations that promote voter rights, and holding elected officials accountable. The fight for fair elections and a strong democracy requires consistent vigilance and proactive engagement from all those who value these principles.
Ultimately, ignoring or downplaying this “troubling trend” is a dangerous gamble. The deliberate and systematic undermining of democratic institutions in North Carolina, and elsewhere, warrants not only concern, but urgent action. The future of American democracy depends on recognizing this threat and actively working to counter it. The consequences of complacency could be catastrophic.