By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a break from traditional mourning practices, Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman, a Republican, has declined to order flags lowered to half-staff following the death of former President Jimmy Carter. This decision contrasts with the actions of many other government entities which have honored Carter with this customary tribute. The reasons behind Blakeman’s refusal have not yet been publicly stated. The action is generating significant controversy.
Read the original article here
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman’s refusal to lower county flags to half-staff following the death of former President Jimmy Carter has sparked widespread outrage and criticism. The decision, perceived by many as a blatant disregard for tradition and a show of disrespect towards a former president, has ignited a firestorm of controversy. This action seems particularly jarring given the generally accepted practice of honoring deceased presidents with this symbolic gesture.
The timing of this refusal is also noteworthy, coming as it does on the heels of various other controversies surrounding Blakeman’s administration. Critics argue that this decision further fuels the perception of his leadership as divisive and out of touch with the sentiments of his constituents. Many are questioning the motivations behind such a seemingly petty and politically charged act.
Blakeman’s salary of $227,959, a figure cited by many commenters, seems to further underscore the perceived lack of sensitivity and appropriateness in his decision. The contrast between his considerable compensation and what many perceive as a small, yet deeply symbolic, act of respect is striking to many. It lends itself to the interpretation that his actions are driven by political posturing rather than genuine respect for the office of the presidency.
The argument that the decision constitutes a breach of established protocol and possibly even the law is repeatedly made. Legal precedents suggest that a formal request for flag lowering exists, and Blakeman’s defiance of this tradition is seen as a deliberate act of defiance. The lack of justification or explanation offered for the decision only intensifies the negative reaction from many within Nassau County and beyond.
The contrast between Blakeman’s actions and his previous behavior is also being noted. His prior invitation to former President Donald Trump for a rally in Nassau County sharply contrasts with his current stance on lowering the flags for President Carter. This perceived inconsistency fuels accusations of hypocrisy and raises questions about whether political affiliation is the primary driving force behind Blakeman’s decisions.
The outrage extends beyond simple partisan politics; many view the refusal to lower flags as a broader indication of the increasing polarization and lack of civility in public discourse. The comments reveal a palpable frustration with what is seen as a deliberate act of disrespect towards a respected figure, regardless of political alignment. The very act of ignoring a widely accepted custom is, for many, a more profound offense than the act itself.
The strong reaction against Blakeman’s decision underscores a deeper issue: the expectations and responsibilities of public officials. The expectation that elected officials will act with decorum and respect, regardless of personal beliefs, is a central pillar of democratic governance. Blakeman’s actions, perceived by many as a blatant disregard for these expectations, have deeply offended those who hold him accountable.
In conclusion, Nassau County Executive Blakeman’s refusal to lower the flags for President Carter is not just a matter of flag protocol. It is viewed as a reflection of broader issues, including political polarization, the erosion of civil discourse, and the expectations of leadership and responsibility in public office. The intense reaction, fueled by both partisan and non-partisan concerns, highlights the symbolic weight of this seemingly simple act and its larger implications for the political climate. The controversy serves as a stark reminder of the importance of respect, even – or perhaps especially – in the face of political disagreement. The enduring legacy of President Carter’s service, and the widespread condemnation of Blakeman’s decision, suggests that the outrage will likely continue to resonate for some time.