By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Analysis of US Air Force C-17 flight patterns suggests a potential transfer of Russian-made weaponry from Israel to Ukraine via Ramstein and Hatzerim air bases. This aligns with recent reports indicating Israel’s consideration of donating captured Russian equipment, including tanks and anti-tank missiles, to aid the Ukrainian war effort. The transfer may also involve retired Israeli Patriot missile batteries. The possibility of this arms transfer was previously discussed publicly by Israeli officials and political figures.
Read the original article here
Israel may have started sending Russian-made weapons to Ukraine, a development fueled by a confluence of geopolitical shifts and strategic considerations. The fall of Assad in Syria significantly altered the regional power dynamics, removing a key Russian pressure point near Israel’s borders. This reduced the risk of direct Russian retaliation should Israel choose to support Ukraine more overtly.
This newfound strategic freedom allows Israel to potentially channel captured Russian weaponry, amassed during previous conflicts, to Ukraine. Israel has a long history of acquiring substantial quantities of Russian-made arms and ammunition, from rifles and rocket launchers to sidearms, during encounters with Syrian and Egyptian forces. This surplus of captured equipment, no longer needed by the Israeli Defense Forces, could now be redirected to support Ukraine’s war effort.
The potential for such a weapons transfer aligns with Israel’s interests in countering both Russia and Iran, key players in the broader geopolitical landscape. Russia’s support for groups hostile to Israel, combined with its reduced regional influence post-Assad, creates an environment where supplying Ukraine with Russian weapons presents less risk and greater strategic benefit. It’s a kind of “poetic justice,” returning Russia’s weapons to them indirectly, albeit in a devastating way.
Furthermore, the historical precedent of Israel indirectly supplying weaponry to those fighting Russia further strengthens this possibility. During the Soviet-Afghan war, there were documented instances of Israel, along with Egypt, supplying captured Soviet equipment to the US and Saudi Arabia, who in turn funneled it to the Afghan Mujahideen via Pakistan. This demonstrates a willingness on Israel’s part to leverage its unique position to provide support to anti-Soviet forces.
Although the Israeli government officially denies such transfers, the possibility remains intriguing and credible. The denials may be a strategic necessity, given Israel’s need to maintain a delicate balance in its relationships with both Russia and the US. However, the underlying strategic rationale for such a move is compelling. This covert support could be coupled with other forms of assistance, such as intelligence sharing, creating a multifaceted approach to assisting Ukraine. The situation also highlights the complexities of modern warfare, where the origin and transfer of weapons can become convoluted and less transparent. This underscores the interconnected nature of global conflicts and the strategic maneuvering behind the scenes.
The potential for Israel to supply Russian weapons to Ukraine represents a unique geopolitical chess move. It allows Israel to indirectly undermine Russia, while simultaneously aiding Ukraine in its fight against a common adversary. The strategic advantages are numerous, considering the potential damage these weapons could inflict while simultaneously reducing Israel’s own stockpile of potentially obsolete materials. While official denials exist, the possibility of this clandestine operation adds another layer of intrigue to the conflict.
This situation also showcases the complex web of alliances and interests at play in the ongoing conflict. The potential for Israel’s covert involvement emphasizes the fluid nature of geopolitical partnerships and the various tools countries employ to further their strategic aims. It’s a reminder that beneath the surface of official statements and pronouncements, many actions and motivations are often hidden, leaving room for speculation and analysis. The ongoing conflict presents a dynamic scenario in which the roles of various players, even those ostensibly “neutral,” remain subject to interpretation and debate.
The entire situation is laden with irony. Russia, supplying weapons to various actors in the Middle East, might now find those same weapons used against them through a circuitous route, with Israel potentially playing a pivotal, yet clandestine, role. This unexpected turn of events underscores the unpredictable nature of modern warfare and the multifaceted, often-hidden dynamics at play. The quiet efficacy of such an operation, if it indeed occurred, is a testament to Israel’s intelligence capabilities and its willingness to act decisively in support of its strategic interests, even in the absence of overt declarations. The future will likely reveal more about the extent of Israel’s involvement, adding further layers to this intriguing chapter in the Ukraine conflict.