By John Q. Hosedrinker 
IDF forces in the West Bank engaged terrorists utilizing mosques and other civilian structures in Jabaliya and Tulkarm to launch attacks, jeopardizing civilian safety. Three mosques—Jabriyat and Khalid Ibn al-Walid in Jenin, and Abu Bakr al-Siddiq in Tulkarm—were identified as terrorist operational bases, with evidence including shooting ranges and spent ammunition found within. Air and ground operations resulted in the elimination of at least 165 terrorists in approximately 110 airstrikes, conducted with precision to minimize civilian harm. The IDF emphasized the persistent use of civilian infrastructure by terrorists for attacks in Judea and Samaria.
Read the original article here
Terrorists using West Bank mosques to launch attacks against Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers is a deeply concerning trend, highlighted recently by IDF reports. The IDF’s assertion that terrorists are using these sacred sites as cover and staging areas for attacks isn’t surprising, given the history of conflict in the region. The strategic advantage of such tactics is undeniable; attacking from within or near a mosque provides both cover and a powerful propaganda tool. If the IDF retaliates, the terrorists gain a narrative advantage, painting themselves as victims defending religious spaces and blaming Israel for collateral damage. This tactic mirrors other instances of using protected locations, like schools or hospitals, to shield military operations from attack.
This strategy relies on the willingness of some to accept a biased narrative, overlooking the evidence of terrorist actions and placing blame solely on the IDF. Three videos published on the IDF website showcase specific incidents, clearly demonstrating the use of mosques in Jenin and Tulkarm for attacks. In Jenin, the Jabriyat and Khalid Ibn al-Walid mosques were identified as locations from which terrorists opened fire on IDF soldiers. The IDF subsequently found a shooting range and training area within the Jabriyat Mosque, underscoring its dual function as a place of worship and a military base. Similarly, in Tulkarm, terrorists were observed using the Abu Bakr al-Siddiq Mosque’s roof to launch explosive devices at soldiers.
These are not isolated incidents. The IDF statement explicitly points to a pattern of terrorist activity utilizing civilian infrastructures, including mosques, hospitals, medical centers, and educational institutions. This consistent pattern of using protected areas necessitates a careful response to avoid civilian casualties while neutralizing the threat. The IDF’s assertion that they conduct airstrikes with precision, adhering to international law and aiming to minimize civilian harm, is a crucial aspect of their narrative. The IDF’s actions in these situations must be carefully weighed against the need to protect their forces and the ethical considerations involved.
The inherent complexity of the situation makes it difficult to achieve a universally accepted narrative. Denials that terrorist activity exists in the West Bank are frequently encountered, often coupled with assertions that Hamas operates solely in Gaza. These statements disregard evidence of attacks emanating from various locations within the West Bank. These videos, and the IDF’s documentation of the events, directly challenge these claims, offering visual proof of terrorist activity originating from mosques. This tactic is not unique to the region or group; the utilization of protected spaces as cover or bases of operation is a common tactic employed by various militant and terrorist groups globally.
While this strategy is effective in garnering negative press for the IDF and deflecting criticism, it’s not the primary objective. The terrorists’ central aim remains violence against Israeli soldiers and civilians. The propaganda element is simply a bonus, a means of reinforcing existing biases and fostering further radicalization. The potential for civilian casualties remains a significant concern, as both sides struggle to balance security operations with the protection of innocent lives. The use of religious sites for military purposes is a clear violation of international law, and the fact that it happens repeatedly underscores the complex and challenging nature of the conflict.
The intentional blurring of lines between religious spaces and military operations demands careful consideration. Mosques are essential parts of the cultural and religious landscape, and their utilization for hostile actions is deeply problematic on multiple levels. It creates a moral dilemma, forces the IDF into difficult decisions, and further exacerbates the already volatile situation. While the use of these sites for attacks is undoubtedly a war crime, the IDF’s subsequent actions must be equally measured and proportionate to avoid further escalation. Ultimately, resolving this issue requires addressing the deeper roots of the conflict while upholding the principles of international humanitarian law. The ongoing violence underscores the tragic cycle of violence and the urgent need for a lasting solution that respects the sanctity of religious sites and protects civilian lives.