By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In late 2024, French special forces conducted Exercise Persée, simulating a Belarusian attack on Ukraine. The extensive drills, involving over 3,000 commandos and diverse technological assets including satellites, drones, and cyber warfare capabilities, mirrored the terrain near Kyiv. The exercise aimed to refine tactical responses to a potential conflict and included testing a mixed fleet of drones, highlighting a potential gap in French military technology. President Macron’s recent discussions with UK Prime Minister Starmer likely included a briefing on these maneuvers and the possibility of European deployment to Ukraine.
Read the original article here
French Special Forces recently conducted a clandestine military exercise simulating a response to a potential Belarusian attack on Ukraine. The exercise, while initially kept secret, has since garnered significant attention, sparking discussions about France’s role in the ongoing conflict and its commitment to supporting Ukraine. The fact that this exercise wasn’t completely hidden adds a layer of intrigue; perhaps it was a deliberate leak, a calculated move to showcase France’s readiness and deter potential aggression. It certainly highlights the seriousness with which France views the threat from Belarus, a key ally of Russia.
This strategic maneuver underlines France’s unwavering support for Ukraine, a commitment that extends beyond mere financial aid. The exercise suggests a proactive approach, demonstrating a willingness to actively participate in defending Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The choice of the training area, reportedly resembling the bend of the Dnieper River, might indicate a specific focus on liberating Ukrainian forces stationed in western Ukraine, allowing for a more effective deployment against Russian forces elsewhere.
The news of the exercise has been met with a mixed reaction. While some praise France for its decisive actions and strong military history – a history often overlooked in favor of focusing on its WWII surrender – others question the extent of its actual contributions compared to its rhetoric. This criticism is noteworthy, considering that France’s military spending as a percentage of GDP might be lower than expected. However, it’s important to recognize that these kinds of actions, even if publicized afterward, serve as a powerful deterrent and a testament to France’s military capabilities.
The exercise’s publicity, even if intentional, raises interesting questions. What intelligence does France possess that makes the public disclosure of this exercise strategically advantageous? It’s possible the French have credible information suggesting an imminent Belarusian threat, prompting this strategic communication. Or perhaps the message is intended for a broader audience, meant to send a message of resolve to Russia and Belarus, and potentially other hesitant allies. This bold move could be France’s attempt to seize a leadership role in Europe, asserting its influence and resolve in the face of escalating tensions.
The French military, and particularly its special forces, have a rich and formidable history. Their expertise and reputation are well-earned, and this exercise serves as a potent reminder of their readiness and capabilities. The exercise’s focus on counteracting a Belarusian invasion is significant, considering Belarus’s strategic position and its close ties with Russia. A Belarusian incursion would significantly complicate the Ukrainian conflict, opening up a new front and potentially diverting Ukrainian resources. It’s clear that preventing this scenario is a paramount concern for France, and indeed for the broader international community.
This French maneuver also underscores the complex and sometimes uneasy relationships between major European powers. The ongoing banter between the British and the French, punctuated by mutual admiration and criticism, underscores their historical connection and their shared commitment to defending European interests. While they might publicly engage in friendly rivalry, when facing a serious threat such as a potential invasion of Ukraine, their shared values and alliances take center stage.
The French government’s perceived proactive and decisive approach, showcased by this publicized exercise, contrasts with some perceptions of other major world powers. Some claim the US, for instance, often lacks clearly defined goals in its military engagements, exhibiting reluctance to act decisively until directly attacked. This perception contrasts sharply with France’s apparent readiness to act preemptively, potentially establishing itself as a strong and reliable European leader in the face of uncertainty and escalating global conflict. In conclusion, the French Special Forces exercise highlights a multifaceted situation involving military readiness, international politics, and the complex dynamics between long-standing allies in the face of an evolving geopolitical landscape.