By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Robert “Bobby” Kinch, a former Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department homicide detective who left the force after advocating for a “race war,” now leads the Utah-based Oath Keepers USA. Evidence obtained by an infiltrator reveals Kinch’s continued involvement with the anti-government group, including firearms, survival gear, and Oath Keepers materials found in his home. This highlights the concerning presence of law enforcement officers within the Oath Keepers, a group central to the January 6th insurrection. The potential return of Donald Trump to the presidency could embolden such groups, exacerbating the threat posed by extremists within police departments.
Read the original article here
The revelation that Robert “Bobby” Kinch, the leader of the Utah-based Oath Keepers USA militia, is a former Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department homicide detective is deeply unsettling. His departure from the force, reportedly following advocacy for a “race war,” paints a troubling picture, suggesting a potential pipeline between law enforcement and right-wing extremist groups.
This discovery, gleaned from public records, online materials, and the work of a long-term infiltrator of the patriot movement, exposes a concerning reality: four years after the January 6th insurrection, the Oath Keepers, far from disappearing, have quietly integrated former and potentially current law enforcement officers into their ranks.
Kinch’s story underscores a pattern that has been observed for decades. The idea of a connection between law enforcement and right-wing militias isn’t new; evidence of such links has surfaced repeatedly, dating back at least to the early 1990s. This isn’t a recent phenomenon, but rather a persistent issue that has manifested in various ways throughout the years.
The fact that Kinch, a former homicide detective, now leads a group with openly extremist views highlights a significant breach of public trust. His past career within the police force, combined with his current role within a group that advocates for violence and racial conflict, raises serious questions about vetting processes and the potential for radicalization within law enforcement agencies. This necessitates a thorough investigation into the extent of this problem and effective strategies to counter it.
The implications of this discovery extend beyond a single individual. It points to a larger issue: the potential for infiltration of law enforcement and military organizations by individuals holding extreme ideologies. The ease with which Kinch transitioned from a career in homicide investigation to leading a right-wing militia raises questions about how effectively these institutions are screening their personnel and addressing extremist views within their ranks. This is a concern that demands immediate attention and comprehensive reform.
The apparent willingness of some law enforcement personnel to join such groups further suggests a deeper problem of systemic biases and a lack of accountability. This challenges the traditional image of law enforcement as protectors of the public, prompting renewed scrutiny and calls for more robust oversight mechanisms. A complete lack of transparency and accountability is fertile ground for the cultivation of such connections, which is a threat to justice, civil liberties, and public safety.
The name “Oath Keepers” itself is ironically relevant. The very name suggests a connection to law enforcement and military personnel, who often take oaths of office. The name choice, therefore, reflects the inherent appeal of these organizations to individuals with backgrounds in such institutions. The fact that this group openly embraces such a name is a testament to the organization’s audaciousness and, perhaps, the complicity of some within these institutions.
This situation raises concerns about the potential for abuse of power and the erosion of public trust. The revelation of Kinch’s background serves as a stark reminder of the importance of ongoing vigilance and transparency in law enforcement and the military, to prevent further radicalization and ensure that such individuals are not allowed to maintain positions of power or authority.
Ultimately, the story of Robert Kinch is a chilling example of how seemingly disparate elements of society can intertwine to create a dangerous and destabilizing force. It should serve as a wake-up call to address the underlying issues that contribute to the rise of extremist groups and their connections to institutions that are supposed to protect the public. This warrants a thorough investigation into the infiltration of law enforcement and similar organizations, and to address the root causes of the problem, to ensure that our communities remain safe and protected from violence. The time for ignoring this problem is long past.