By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Biden commuted the sentence of Leonard Peltier, an 80-year-old American Indian Movement activist serving a life sentence for the 1975 murder of two FBI agents. Though maintaining his innocence, Peltier will now serve his sentence under home confinement. His commutation follows decades of advocacy highlighting concerns about the evidence used in his conviction, including a statement from a former prosecutor expressing doubts about the case. This decision concludes nearly five decades of imprisonment for Peltier.
Read the original article here
Did Elon Musk seriously just do a Nazi salute at Trump’s inauguration? The overwhelming consensus across numerous online discussions is a resounding yes. Multiple accounts detail witnessing the gesture, not once, but twice. Many observers describe the salute as unmistakable, performed with a clear and deliberate movement, not a fleeting or ambiguous gesture. Some even claim the crowd reacted with cheers, amplifying the gravity of the situation.
The sheer brazenness of the act, if true, is shocking. Several commenters express disbelief that such an overt display could occur at a presidential inauguration. The lack of subtlety, the seemingly intentional nature of the gesture, is highlighted repeatedly. Several commenters recount their initial hesitation, considering the possibility of a misinterpretation, only to be convinced otherwise upon viewing video footage.
The responses to the alleged salute range from outrage and disgust to a chilling sense of foreboding. Some express fear about the implications, seeing it as a sign of escalating extremism and a normalization of fascist symbols. Others are deeply concerned by the apparent lack of widespread media coverage, suggesting a potential effort to suppress the story or minimize its significance.
This alleged act is viewed by many as far more than just a poorly timed movement or a misinterpreted gesture. Commenters emphasize the historical weight of the Nazi salute, its symbolic representation of hatred and oppression. The argument that it could be mistaken for a Roman salute is dismissed due to the context, Musk’s known public persona, and the very specific nature of the gesture observed.
The silence from major news outlets is a significant point of contention. The lack of prominent coverage is interpreted as a deliberate attempt to downplay the incident, fueling accusations of complicity or a conscious effort to avoid controversy. The contrast is drawn between the perceived lack of journalistic integrity regarding this event and the extensive media coverage of other, arguably less significant matters.
Even the attempt to explain away the salute as something other than a Nazi salute is met with strong pushback. The consensus is that such a gesture, given its historical context and the unambiguous nature of its execution, can only be interpreted in one way. The notion of accidental performance is widely rejected.
The reaction from far-right groups adds another layer of complexity. Their enthusiastic endorsement and celebratory sharing of the video clip on platforms like Telegram solidifies, for many, the interpretation of the gesture as a deliberate Nazi salute. This apparent support from known extremist groups strengthens the conviction that the gesture was not accidental but an intentional show of solidarity.
Ultimately, while definitively proving the intention behind the gesture remains impossible without further evidence, the overwhelming weight of online commentary points toward an intentional act by Elon Musk that, if true, carries immense political and social implications. The sheer volume of accounts corroborating the claim of a Nazi salute, combined with the lack of credible counterarguments, leaves little room for doubt in the minds of many. The perceived silence from mainstream media only serves to amplify these concerns. The event, regardless of its ultimate verification, has clearly touched a nerve within the public consciousness.