By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Lieutenant General Mike Elviss warns that a Ukrainian ceasefire would enable Russia to rebuild its forces and strengthen ties with a new axis of aggressors, including China, Iran, and North Korea. This would initiate a global arms race focused on armored forces, as Russia seeks to reconstitute its military capabilities for future conflicts. Concerns exist that Russia’s adaptable military could emerge stronger from such a conflict. Senior UK officials fear a renewed Russian aggression, particularly if a peace deal is brokered, highlighting the need for sustained Western security commitments. This mirrors Ukrainian President Zelenskyy’s warnings of a more dangerous future conflict without robust security guarantees.
Read the original article here
Once guns fall silent in Ukraine, the expectation is that Russia will initiate a significant military revival. This isn’t merely a post-conflict rebuilding; it’s a strategic repositioning for future conflicts. The sheer scale of the current war means that, unlike previous conflicts, a substantial portion of Russia’s military will possess valuable combat experience, significantly enhancing their future effectiveness.
This contrasts sharply with previous Russian military engagements where combat experience was concentrated among a smaller percentage of personnel. The current war’s intensity ensures future Russian military units will have a core of veterans, improving their training, leadership, and overall fighting capabilities. This potential resurgence is a matter of significant concern, highlighting the need for sustained vigilance and strategic preparedness by the West.
The current conflict has provided Russia with invaluable lessons learned. This includes mastering hybrid warfare tactics, incorporating advancements in technology, and crucial insights into logistics and military production. Their proficiency in electronic warfare, for example, has become remarkably advanced, surpassing even NATO’s combined capabilities.
Russia’s military resurgence is not limited to conventional warfare expertise. The war has revealed a potential for expanding their recruitment base through the incorporation of foreign mercenaries, perhaps exploiting global vulnerabilities. The ease with which Russia might access a vast pool of recruits from across the globe by offering substantial financial incentives poses a serious threat.
Furthermore, the West’s limited tolerance for prolonged conflict is a key factor in Russia’s strategic calculus. While the West has suffered minimal direct casualties or lifestyle disruptions, even minor economic challenges like inflation have eroded public support for prolonged involvement. This fragility in Western resolve represents a strategic advantage for Russia as they prepare for future conflicts.
The potential for future escalation is further exacerbated by other geopolitical considerations. The anticipated Taiwan conflict in 2027, coupled with Russia’s resurgence, paints a disconcertingly bleak picture for the future. This emphasizes the urgent need for strategic planning and decisive action by Western powers, and the importance of Ukraine’s role.
Securing Ukraine’s place within NATO or the EU is a crucial step in countering Russia’s potential resurgence. This would establish a clear red line against further aggression. The economic sanctions against Russia must also remain in place to hamper its ability to rebuild and rearm. Offering Russia a path toward normalized relations through concessions on territorial claims, reparations, and democratic reforms could provide a long-term solution. However, this approach requires a determined and sustained commitment.
A significant challenge lies in the West’s ability to sustain its resolve and counter Russia’s potential military buildup. The possibility of a protracted period of renewed conflict in Eastern Europe needs careful consideration. Europe needs to invest heavily in its military and defense industries to counter Russia’s potential military surge. A strengthened European defense system, with key players like Germany, Poland, and France leading the way, is paramount.
The Western perception that Russia’s military capabilities are weak due to the current conflict is potentially a dangerous miscalculation. Russia will use this period of relative peace to rebuild and rearm. This means the West must not underestimate Russia’s future potential. Dismissing Russia’s capability based on current battlefield setbacks ignores the lessons learned and the resources available to Russia for a significant military revival.
The potential for Russia to employ a protracted strategy of low-intensity conflict targeting weaker nations must also be considered. These actions, involving unconventional warfare tactics, could destabilize regions and exhaust Western resolve before any major military conflict.
Ultimately, a failure to address the potential for a Russian military revival will have far-reaching consequences. The current conflict provides only a temporary respite, and failure to prepare adequately could lead to a much more perilous future. The need for strategic foresight and decisive action is paramount to safeguarding peace and stability in the region and beyond.