By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following Austria’s September election, President Alexander Van der Bellen mandated Freedom Party leader Herbert Kickl to form a new government, marking a potential first far-right government since WWII. This decision followed failed attempts to form a coalition without the Freedom Party, which won 28.8% of the vote. Coalition talks between the Freedom Party and the People’s Party are underway, though their success is uncertain, and a new election is a possibility. The Freedom Party’s platform includes anti-immigration policies, opposition to sanctions against Russia, and a push for greater Austrian autonomy from the EU.
Read the original article here
Austria is on the cusp of a significant political shift. For the first time since World War II, a far-right party, the FPÖ (Freedom Party of Austria), is poised to lead the government. This development, while not entirely unforeseen, has sent shockwaves through the country and beyond. The path to this juncture has been a complex one, marked by failed coalition negotiations and a palpable sense of political gridlock.
Initially, the ÖVP (Austrian People’s Party), the second-strongest party, was tasked with forming a government. However, the reluctance of other parties to cooperate with the FPÖ, due to its far-right ideology and controversial past, led to months of fruitless negotiations. This period underscored a deep division within the Austrian political landscape: a stark disagreement about the legitimacy of collaboration with the FPÖ.
These stalled talks ultimately culminated in the resignation of the ÖVP leader and a dramatic about-face. The previous strategy of excluding the FPÖ, supposedly driven by a “stop the far-right” agenda, has clearly backfired. This failure to address the underlying concerns that fueled the FPÖ’s rise created a political vacuum, allowing the far-right to seize the initiative.
The potential ascension of Herbert Kickl, the FPÖ leader, to the chancellorship is particularly alarming for many. Kickl is known for his pro-Russian stance, openly criticizing any Austrian politician who dares to condemn Vladimir Putin. This is particularly worrisome given the ongoing war in Ukraine and Austria’s position within the European Union. His rhetoric aligns him significantly closer to Putin’s ideology than even controversial figures like Viktor Orbán.
Beyond his geopolitical views, Kickl’s history is littered with red flags. He is an avowed anti-vaxxer, a conspiracy theorist, and has been accused of downplaying Nazi war crimes. Accusations of racism further fuel concerns about his suitability for high office. The FPÖ’s ties to Russia run deeper, with past scandals involving alleged Russian funding and close relationships with pro-Kremlin figures. The party’s consistent calls to end sanctions against Russia further emphasize its troubling alignment with Moscow.
The lack of viable alternatives has left Austria with limited options. The electorate’s preferences, even if not explicitly endorsing a far-right government, haven’t offered clear solutions. This demonstrates a lack of trust in established parties and the failure to present compelling alternative visions. The fact that 70% of the electorate voted for parties that publicly opposed an FPÖ coalition points to a widespread desire to avoid this outcome, questioning the claim that this represents a straightforward mandate.
This situation resonates with historical precedents, highlighting a chilling familiarity with past political turmoil. The specter of Austria’s history under right-wing rule weighs heavily on current events, a reminder of the dangers of unchecked nationalism and authoritarianism. The potential for the FPÖ to govern evokes concerns about the erosion of democratic norms, the potential rise of authoritarianism, and the damaging impact on Austria’s international standing.
The rise of the far-right in Austria isn’t an isolated phenomenon. Across Europe and beyond, similar trends can be witnessed, revealing a common thread of discontent, disillusionment, and perceived political failures that have allowed extremist voices to gain traction. These disenfranchised segments of the population are drawn to promises of simple solutions, even if those solutions are clearly detrimental in the long run.
The future remains uncertain, but Austria’s experience serves as a stark warning. The failure of mainstream parties to address the root causes of the far-right’s appeal has paved the way for a dangerous political shift. The potential consequences range from damage to Austria’s international reputation and further erosion of democratic norms to a full-blown authoritarian resurgence. The Austrian people, and indeed the international community, will be closely watching the unfolding events with bated breath. The situation necessitates critical self-reflection, not just in Austria, but globally, regarding how to counteract the rise of far-right populism effectively. The potential consequences are too grave to ignore.