By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Five Assumption University students, inspired by the TV show *To Catch a Predator* and a TikTok trend, lured a soldier to campus via Tinder, falsely accusing him of soliciting underage sex. The ensuing attack involved a large group of students, resulting in charges of kidnapping, conspiracy, and assault. The victim, who was in town for a funeral, suffered injuries during the assault, which was captured on video. The university condemned the students’ actions, describing the incident as abhorrent and highlighting the dangers of harmful social media trends.
Read the original article here
Assumption University students facing charges for luring a 22-year-old soldier to a beating using Tinder highlights a disturbing trend of vigilante justice gone wrong. The incident, fueled by a perceived age gap between the soldier and an 18-year-old woman, led to a premeditated ambush and assault, raising serious questions about the students’ judgment and the potential influence of societal pressures and online trends.
The blatant disregard for the law displayed by these students is deeply concerning. Their actions, far from heroic, represent a dangerous escalation of online interactions. The fact that they planned and executed this attack, lying in wait to ambush their victim, demonstrates a level of premeditation that warrants severe consequences. This isn’t a case of a spontaneous altercation; it was a calculated act of violence.
The age gap between the soldier and the 18-year-old woman, while potentially raising eyebrows for some, is not illegal. The age of consent in many jurisdictions is 16 or 18, rendering the relationship itself not a crime. This makes the students’ actions even more reprehensible, as their perceived moral justification for violence is based on a questionable premise. Their belief that they were somehow acting as moral arbiters, dispensing justice outside the legal system, is both misguided and extremely dangerous.
The incident underscores the dangers of online vigilante justice, particularly given the prevalence of apps like Tinder. The ease with which the students lured their victim suggests a disturbing lack of awareness regarding the potential legal and personal ramifications of their actions. It seems they were more focused on achieving a self-satisfying sense of righteous violence than on understanding the potential consequences.
Furthermore, the incident raises questions about the role of the university in fostering such behavior. The high cost of tuition at Assumption University, coupled with the alleged prevalence of bullying and a toxic environment, raises questions about the institution’s responsibility in cultivating a culture that permits such violence. The university’s administration bears a responsibility to create a climate where such actions are not only condemned but actively prevented.
The comments surrounding this incident express a wide range of emotions, from outrage and disgust to cynicism and disillusionment. Many are questioning the motivations of the students, suggesting a possible mix of misguided moral judgment, the thrill of violence, and a desire for social validation. The comparison to other similar incidents, involving both teens and adults using dating apps to lure victims into ambushes, indicates a disturbing pattern that needs to be addressed.
The fact that one of the perpetrators was a baseball player further underscores the prevalence of this issue across various social groups. This undermines the simplistic notion that such behavior is confined to a specific demographic or social circle. The incident reveals a deeper problem with how individuals perceive and act upon perceived injustice.
The apparent lack of remorse and the justification for their actions presented by some defending the students highlights the need for a wider societal discussion about the dangers of vigilante justice. The act of violence is inherently wrong and is not condoned, regardless of perceived justification or the moral character of the victim. The students’ actions were illegal and should be treated as such, regardless of the victim’s perceived character.
Ultimately, this case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of respecting the law and the due process of justice. The students’ actions, driven by misguided assumptions and a thirst for self-styled justice, have resulted in serious charges and the potential for long-term consequences. The incident underscores the need for a more thoughtful approach to addressing real concerns about sexual predation, violence, and safety, one that prioritizes legal processes over self-styled vigilante actions. The incident also provides a cautionary tale against the potential for disastrous outcomes when individuals seek to become self-appointed judges, juries, and executioners. The focus must remain on accountability, legal processes, and ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their beliefs or motivations, are held responsible for their actions.