By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The resurgence of Donald Trump and his administration necessitates a renewed emphasis on the societal importance of shame. Trump’s success stems from normalizing public displays of ignorance and unfounded claims by himself and his allies, exemplified by instances like his mischaracterizations of the New Orleans attack and Kennedy’s nomination to a critical health position. Tolerating such behavior, rather than publicly shaming it, has emboldened the spread of misinformation and harmful policies. Therefore, actively confronting and mocking demonstrably stupid statements from public figures is crucial to counteracting the influence of Trumpism.
Read the original article here
As Trump’s election is certified, the stark reality is that a significant portion of the American populace appears to have embraced a form of willful ignorance, a dangerous apathy toward truth and critical thinking. This isn’t a new phenomenon; the battle against stupidity has been waged for far longer, and the evidence suggests we’ve already lost. The very notion of declaring war on this pervasive intellectual lethargy seems almost comical in its futility, a testament to the depth of the problem.
The ease with which misinformation spreads, amplified by social media and a readily available echo chamber of like-minded individuals, underscores the scale of this challenge. The recent election results serve as a potent example; the success of candidates who actively promote demonstrably false narratives highlights the deep-seated vulnerabilities within our information ecosystem. It’s not just a matter of individual choices; it’s a systemic issue fueled by intentional manipulation and a lack of critical thinking skills.
The idea that education is an enemy to fascism is, unfortunately, a valid one. A populace ill-equipped to analyze information critically is easily manipulated. The absence of critical thinking allows for the acceptance of falsehoods and the rejection of factual information, creating fertile ground for authoritarianism. The apparent indifference to demonstrable falsehoods among a significant portion of the electorate is a serious concern, indicating a systemic weakness that will be difficult to overcome.
The suggestion that we should “make politicians who say stupid things feel uncomfortable” is a good starting point, but it’s a reactive measure, a band-aid on a gaping wound. The problem runs far deeper than mere political rhetoric. It’s rooted in the pervasive culture of misinformation and the erosion of trust in established institutions. To declare a war on stupidity would require a massive, coordinated effort to combat this systemic issue, and even then success is far from guaranteed.
Some argue that this war is already lost. The election of a figure notorious for his disregard for truth and facts certainly supports this view. Others suggest that the problem is rooted in a fundamental lack of critical thinking skills within a significant segment of the population, a deficit that can’t be easily rectified. Indeed, a deep-seated distrust of established sources of information, coupled with the addictive nature of social media, makes a successful campaign against misinformation seem an almost impossible task. The very notion of a “war on stupidity” is inherently problematic; stupidity itself is not an enemy that can be defeated through military or political means. It’s more akin to a disease, a cultural infection that has spread and taken hold, corroding the foundations of rational discourse.
The comparison to other “wars” on societal ills, such as the War on Drugs or the War on Terror, highlights the futility of such a broad-brush approach. These wars have been marked by unintended consequences, highlighting the complexities of societal problems and the inherent difficulty of addressing them with a simplistic military framework. The lack of widespread outrage regarding the prevalence of misinformation further suggests that the situation is even more severe. Many seem content in their existing information bubbles, accepting pre-packaged narratives instead of engaging in critical self-reflection.
There’s a significant difference between ignorance and stupidity. Ignorance is a lack of knowledge; it can be rectified through education and exposure to new information. Stupidity, on the other hand, represents a refusal to learn, an active resistance to acknowledging and accepting evidence that contradicts pre-conceived notions. This distinction is critical; it highlights the challenges in targeting this problem effectively. A focus solely on education may not be sufficient; a much broader, more complex approach is required to combat willful ignorance and the deliberate propagation of falsehoods.
Addressing the root causes of misinformation requires a multifaceted approach. This includes media literacy education, the regulation of social media platforms to combat the spread of disinformation, and a concerted effort to rebuild trust in established institutions. But even these measures are unlikely to solve the problem entirely. The issue of economic inequality also plays a significant role, as those who feel economically marginalized may be more susceptible to populist narratives that offer simple solutions to complex problems. The underlying problem is not solely ignorance, but also a deep-seated sense of disenfranchisement and a rejection of the existing political establishment. The challenge of combating this sentiment should not be underestimated.
Ultimately, declaring war on stupidity is a symbolic gesture, a recognition of the seriousness of the situation. The real battle requires a more nuanced and multifaceted approach, one that addresses the systemic issues that allow misinformation to thrive. Simply calling out stupidity is insufficient; we need effective strategies to combat the roots of this problem, to foster a culture of critical thinking, and to rebuild trust in factual information. The task is daunting, the odds are stacked against success, but the alternative – the continued erosion of truth and reason – is far worse.