By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite winning re-election on a platform of lowering costs, President-elect Trump faces significant public skepticism regarding his ability to reduce prices on groceries, housing, and healthcare. While confidence in his job creation abilities is somewhat higher, only a minority of Americans express strong confidence in his economic leadership. Republican support for Trump remains robust, with a large majority anticipating a successful second term, although even within the Republican party, confidence in his ability to lower specific costs remains less than absolute. Conversely, Democratic pessimism, while still prevalent, is somewhat less pronounced than at the end of his first term.
Read the original article here
Many Americans doubt Trump will be able to lower prices in his first year. This skepticism stems from a variety of factors, including his past actions and policy proposals. The belief that he possesses the ability to significantly impact prices seems to be held by a smaller subset of the population than many might assume.
Many Americans are unconvinced that Trump’s stated goal of lowering prices is achievable, let alone within his first year in office. This doubt is fueled by a lack of faith in his ability to deliver on promises, particularly given his track record. Previous promises made during his campaigns and his time in office that went unfulfilled have left many people cynical about his current pronouncements.
The notion that he can effectively lower prices is questioned by many who feel that his past actions and proposed policies would actually lead to increased costs. Tariffs, for example, are seen as a significant factor that would likely drive up the price of goods and services. Additionally, the perceived dismantling of consumer protections, regulatory oversight, and environmental safeguards are seen as increasing costs in other ways.
The belief that Trump can lower prices appears to be strongly correlated with existing political affiliations and predispositions. It’s seen by many as a naive expectation, particularly considering the complex economic factors that influence pricing. Some believe that attributing this power to a single individual, regardless of their position, is a misunderstanding of how the economy works. The economic situation is too nuanced to be controlled by a single person.
Many feel Trump’s focus on lowering prices was merely a campaign strategy, a tactic to appeal to voters concerned about the cost of living. The claim that lowering prices is a core objective is not taken seriously by many, who point to other priorities that seem to contradict this goal. Some feel this pledge was never sincere, and his policy choices will inevitably lead to higher prices.
The perception that Trump is more interested in self-enrichment than in serving the public good further fuels the skepticism surrounding his ability to lower prices. Many believe his actions are motivated by personal gain, rather than a genuine desire to improve the economic well-being of everyday Americans. This lack of trust is a significant factor contributing to the widespread belief that he will not succeed in lowering prices.
The time frame of “his first year” itself is questioned by many who doubt any meaningful change will occur at all. Even if one were to assume that he had the ability to influence prices, the complexity of economic systems makes a one-year turnaround improbable for most. Some people are skeptical that prices will lower under his administration at all, let alone within a short time frame.
Many believe that voters who supported Trump based on his promise to lower prices were either uninformed or deluded. The hope that he would be able to single-handedly control prices is seen as unrealistic, with many pointing to the multitude of economic forces beyond the control of any president. This perspective points to a broader concern of political misrepresentation and the gullibility of certain segments of the electorate.
Even if Trump were to succeed in lowering certain prices, many believe that the negative consequences of his other policies would outweigh any benefits. Concerns about the potential damage to environmental regulations, worker protections, and social safety nets are central to this argument. A short-term price reduction would be overshadowed by long-term negative effects for many.
Ultimately, widespread doubt about Trump’s ability to lower prices reflects a lack of trust in his intentions and capabilities. This skepticism is grounded in his past actions, policy proposals, and the perceived limitations of presidential power when it comes to directly influencing economic factors. The general consensus is that any change in prices will be far more complex than a simple presidential decree and will likely involve both intended and unintended consequences.