By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In Alabama and Mississippi, Martin Luther King Jr. Day is jointly observed with Robert E. Lee Day, a legacy from early 20th-century state legislation honoring Confederate leaders. This juxtaposition of figures with opposing legacies persists despite repeated legislative efforts by Black lawmakers in both states to separate the holidays. Recent attempts to either remove Lee’s recognition or reschedule his observance have failed to gain sufficient support. While other Southern states have removed or altered similar Confederate holidays, Alabama and Mississippi remain the only two states that continue this practice.
Read the original article here
Alabama and Mississippi’s continued honoring of Robert E. Lee on Martin Luther King Jr. Day is a stark and deeply unsettling juxtaposition. The sheer audacity of celebrating a Confederate general on a day dedicated to a champion of civil rights speaks volumes about the lingering racial tensions and historical revisionism within these states. It’s a blatant display of disrespect, not just towards Dr. King’s legacy, but towards the very principles of equality and justice he fought for.
The fact that this practice has persisted for decades, even after the federal establishment of MLK Day, is frankly astonishing. It’s not a recent phenomenon; it’s a long-standing tradition rooted in a romanticized view of the Confederacy that ignores the brutal reality of slavery and the systematic oppression it perpetuated. This isn’t just a matter of historical ignorance; it’s a conscious choice to uphold a narrative that glorifies treason and the fight to preserve a system built on human bondage.
The argument that this is merely a “celebration of defenders of causes” rings hollow. While Lee may have exhibited certain personal qualities, his cause was irrevocably tied to the defense of slavery, a moral stain that cannot be erased by any attempt at historical revisionism. The undeniable fact remains that Lee led an army fighting to maintain a system of oppression, a system that inflicted immense suffering and injustice upon millions of people.
The irony is palpable. These states choose to honor a general who ultimately surrendered, a decisive defeat that marked the end of the Confederacy, while simultaneously celebrating him on a day dedicated to a leader who fought for the very principles that the Confederacy vehemently opposed. It’s a jarring dissonance that highlights the deep-seated divisions and unresolved historical trauma still present in parts of the American South.
The sheer hypocrisy is breathtaking. The states involved seem to hold onto a narrative that minimizes the brutality of slavery and the Confederacy’s ultimate defeat, clinging to a romanticized version of their history that is out of touch with the realities of the past and the present. The fact that this has continued essentially unchanged for so long highlights a resistance to acknowledging and confronting this deeply problematic aspect of their heritage.
To suggest this is “not new” or “not surprising” is not an excuse; it’s a condemnation. It reveals a disturbing level of complacency and acceptance of a status quo that actively celebrates figures associated with oppression and injustice. It’s a stark reminder that the fight for racial equality and justice is far from over, and the legacy of slavery continues to cast a long shadow over American society. It also brings to light the insidious nature of white supremacist ideology’s lingering presence and influence.
The argument that it’s simply a matter of states’ rights to honor whom they choose ignores the larger context. This isn’t about simple historical remembrance; it’s about the continued celebration of a symbol of white supremacy on a day honoring a leader who dedicated his life to dismantling such systems. It’s an act of symbolic violence that continues to perpetuate racial division and injustice.
The parallels between the celebration of Lee and the broader political landscape are undeniable. The rise of MAGA politics, the proliferation of Confederate symbols, and the resurgence of white supremacist rhetoric all point to a concerning trend of historical revisionism and a persistent refusal to grapple with the painful realities of America’s past. The actions of these states are not isolated incidents; they are symptoms of a larger, ongoing struggle for racial justice and equality.
Furthermore, the comparison to other countries’ treatment of traitors is valid. The lack of widespread condemnation for this act of honoring a traitor to the Union further underscores the exceptionalism of this situation within the context of American history. It invites reflection on how the nation views its own history and its complicated relationship with the legacy of slavery and the Civil War. The fact that such a blatant display of allegiance to a lost cause can persist speaks volumes about the ongoing challenge of reconciling with the past.
Ultimately, Alabama and Mississippi’s decision to honor Robert E. Lee on Martin Luther King Jr. Day is more than just a historical anomaly; it’s a powerful symbol of the ongoing struggle for racial justice and equality in the United States. The juxtaposition of these figures, and the continued celebration of Lee, is a stark reminder of the work that still needs to be done to confront and overcome the legacy of slavery and white supremacy.