By John Q. Hosedrinker 
South Korea’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) reported that at least 300 North Korean soldiers have died and 2,700 have been wounded fighting in Russia’s Kursk Oblast, largely due to their inexperience in modern warfare. These casualties align with President Zelensky’s earlier claim of 4,000 total North Korean casualties. The NIS also alleges that North Korean soldiers have been forced to commit suicide to evade capture by Ukrainian forces, a claim corroborated by the White House. Recently, Ukraine captured two North Korean soldiers, highlighting the ongoing conflict’s impact on North Korean troops deployed to support Russia.
Read the original article here
Seoul’s report of 3,000 North Korean casualties in the Kursk Oblast of Russia highlights a stark reality: a profound lack of understanding of modern warfare within the North Korean military. The sheer number of casualties in such a relatively short timeframe suggests a catastrophic failure in tactics, training, and overall strategic thinking. It paints a picture of troops ill-equipped to handle the realities of a contemporary battlefield, essentially functioning as cannon fodder.
The staggering loss of life speaks volumes about the limitations of North Korea’s military doctrine, rooted in outdated strategies and a complete lack of recent combat experience. Their last significant engagement, the Korean War, ended over seventy years ago, a chasm of technological and tactical advancements that leaves their soldiers hopelessly unprepared for the complexities of modern warfare. It’s a situation further exacerbated by the likely reality that many of these soldiers are not elite units but raw recruits, inadequately trained and thrown into the brutal reality of the conflict without sufficient preparation.
The comparison to video game strategies, specifically the Call of Duty franchise, is apt, albeit darkly humorous. The images conjured—North Korean soldiers charging across open fields, mimicking strategies from decades past—underscore the disconnect between their training and the actual conditions of the battlefield. Such reckless advances, devoid of modern tactical considerations, tragically result in mass casualties, making them easy targets for even relatively basic military tactics and technology.
The idea that these soldiers are deployed not to win, but to learn, adds another layer of tragic irony. It suggests that the North Korean regime views its soldiers as expendable, sacrificing their lives for the purported benefit of gaining valuable combat experience. This cold calculation reveals a callous disregard for human life, prioritizing the theoretical advancement of military capabilities over the lives of its soldiers. The survival of even a few of these soldiers, who manage to return home, might be seen as a net gain in the regime’s calculation.
The comments suggest an alarming lack of technological awareness. Modern communication and information technology are seemingly absent or underdeveloped. One can only speculate about the absence of basic equipment that would improve survivability. Such an absence drastically reduces their chances of survival. This highlights a broader challenge: the North Korean army’s technological backwardness makes them particularly vulnerable in a conflict defined by sophisticated weaponry and surveillance technology.
The criticism extends beyond the North Korean military itself. Some suggest that the Russian military leadership bears a significant share of the blame. By deploying North Korean troops into situations where they’re highly likely to suffer heavy losses, it is alleged Russia is treating them as nothing more than cannon fodder, further demonstrating a disregard for human life. Russia’s reported reliance on outdated trench warfare tactics also places the North Korean soldiers at a significant disadvantage. This contributes to the high casualty rate and reinforces the idea of them being expendable assets in a larger geopolitical game.
The contrasting situations of North and South Korea are equally compelling. While North Korea is thrusting its soldiers into brutal combat for a crash course in modern warfare, South Korea, despite its advanced technology and resources, seems to be lacking in real-world combat experience. This paradoxical situation raises questions about South Korea’s defense strategy and its ability to effectively counter a technologically superior adversary.
The high number of casualties raises significant questions about the accuracy and reliability of the reporting itself. However, even allowing for a margin of error or exaggeration, the sheer scale of the reported losses suggests that something has gone drastically wrong. Regardless of the exact figures, the reality remains that North Korean troops are experiencing massive casualties in Ukraine, highlighting an apparent lack of understanding regarding modern military tactics and technology.