By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ellen Greenberg’s autopsy revealed eleven bruises, described as “in various stages of resolution,” suggesting infliction over time. An independent pathologist later deemed these bruises consistent with a repeated beating. Despite an initial homicide ruling, the medical examiner subsequently changed the cause of death to suicide, a decision disputed by Greenberg’s family. This ruling stemmed from the belief she was alone in a locked apartment, a claim contradicted by evidence suggesting otherwise. Ongoing lawsuits by the Greenberg family continue to challenge the official narrative and seek justice for their daughter.
Read the original article here
She had 20 knife wounds and at least 11 bruises. Authorities said she killed herself. This assertion, however, seems utterly implausible given the sheer number and location of the wounds. The sheer physical impossibility of self-inflicting such injuries is staggering. One wound, deep enough to sever the spinal cord, would have paralyzed her almost instantly, rendering further self-inflicted stabbing impossible.
The back and neck wounds further complicate the suicide theory. These areas are incredibly difficult to reach and stab effectively without assistance. The awkward angles required and the inherent difficulty of self-manipulation make this scenario highly improbable. The level of pain and the potential for collapse after just a few wounds render the idea of self-infliction of 20 stab wounds nonsensical.
The fiancé’s 911 call also raises serious questions. His immediate and certain declaration of suicide seems unusual. One would expect a more hesitant and uncertain description in the immediate aftermath of discovering such a gruesome scene. This swift and confident assessment adds fuel to the doubts surrounding the official narrative.
The speed at which the police ruled the death a suicide is highly suspect. The physical impossibility of self-infliction should have triggered a more thorough investigation. Instead, the hasty conclusion points towards a potential cover-up. The lack of a comprehensive investigation 13 years later further hinders any hopes of justice for the victim and her family. The potential destruction or removal of crucial evidence over time compounds this issue.
The presence of at least 11 bruises suggests a history of physical abuse. These injuries, coupled with the numerous stab wounds, paint a picture far more complex than a simple suicide. The authorities’ failure to investigate these bruises adequately, and their subsequent conclusion that it was a suicide, is alarming. A lawsuit against the department seems a necessary action for the victim’s family, but the passage of time may now hinder this path to justice.
The possible involvement of wealthy or politically connected individuals further clouds the issue. Speculation suggests potential cover-ups driven by the influence and power of the fiancé’s family. This suspicion heightens the existing concerns about the official narrative and the lack of a truly independent investigation. The possibility of external involvement and obstruction of justice significantly undermines the credibility of the suicide ruling.
The sheer number of wounds—a deep wound penetrating the aorta, another piercing the liver, and yet another penetrating the skull—makes the suicide theory exceptionally implausible. The order in which these wounds would have been inflicted raises critical anatomical questions. The theory of self-infliction requires the victim to have maintained consciousness and the ability to continue stabbing herself despite severe and life-threatening injuries. This defies logic and medical understanding.
The lack of a thorough investigation, coupled with the implausibility of the suicide scenario, and whispers of influence and cover-up, raises serious concerns about the integrity of the investigation. The sheer number of stab wounds, combined with the bruises and the circumstances surrounding the discovery of the body, point towards a much darker, more sinister reality. The family’s ongoing fight for justice deserves to be highlighted and supported. The authorities’ apparent negligence and the potential corruption involved are unacceptable. This case demands a fresh, unbiased review, free from outside influence, to deliver the truth and provide the victim and her family with the justice they deserve.