By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Emily Borgwardt filed for legal separation from her husband, Ryan, citing an irretrievably broken marriage after 22 years. The petition requests sole custody of their three teenage children and indicates Ryan’s current address is unknown. Ryan, who faked his own drowning to escape to Eastern Europe, has been charged with obstructing the search for his body following his return to the U.S. He was released on a signature bond and intends to represent himself in court.
Read the original article here
The wife of a Wisconsin kayaker who faked his own death is moving to end their marriage, and it’s a move many find understandable given the circumstances. It must be incredibly difficult to discover that your husband, the father of your children, orchestrated such a dramatic and deceitful escape from family life. The sheer audacity of faking one’s death to avoid marital problems is staggering, and the emotional fallout for those left behind is likely immense.
This situation highlights the devastating consequences of choosing deception over communication and responsibility. Instead of facing his marital issues head-on, he opted for a drastic, illegal, and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to vanish. The question of why he didn’t simply file for divorce remains unanswered, though speculations abound – perhaps fear of alimony payments, perhaps a misguided belief that a clean break could be achieved through subterfuge. Whatever his reasoning, his actions clearly speak to a profound lack of consideration for his wife and children.
The impact on his children is likely to be profound and long-lasting. The betrayal of trust, the prolonged anxiety of the search, and the eventual revelation of their father’s deception will undoubtedly leave lasting scars. They’ll have to navigate the complex emotions of grief, anger, and confusion, potentially requiring extensive therapy to process the trauma. Their experience underscores the significant harm inflicted not only on his spouse but on his own children.
The wife’s decision to file for divorce seems entirely justified. After enduring the ordeal of a false death and the subsequent discovery of his deception, continuing the marriage would be unthinkable for most. Her statement that he’s “dead to me” speaks volumes about the irrevocability of the damage done to their relationship. The emotional toll is immeasurable, and starting a new life independent of him is a necessary step towards healing.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the extreme lengths some individuals will go to avoid confronting difficult situations. While the husband’s actions may be viewed as cowardly, it’s important to recognize that this isn’t an isolated incident. Many people, facing the prospect of conflict or responsibility, might choose evasion over engagement. However, this case illustrates just how poorly such strategies tend to play out in the long run.
The husband’s decision to represent himself in court is a further indication of his poor judgment and lack of remorse. His actions throughout this entire ordeal showcase a pattern of self-centeredness and a disregard for the consequences of his choices. Ultimately, he’s facing repercussions far more severe than a simple divorce ever could have been.
The fact that he returned to the United States, after seemingly finding a haven in Eastern Europe, is perplexing. Did he underestimate the reach of the authorities? Was it a lapse in judgment, perhaps driven by the need for contact with his family, or the urge to somehow rectify the situation? It’s difficult to comprehend the thought process that led to his return, given the potential consequences he undoubtedly faced.
The story raises questions about societal expectations of marriage and divorce. Why is the burden of resolving marital conflict so frequently placed disproportionately on one partner? Why is the process of separating often perceived as so daunting that individuals resort to such drastic measures? The husband’s actions suggest systemic issues concerning the pressures placed on individuals within the institution of marriage.
Beyond the legal and emotional ramifications, this case also reveals a disturbing trend in personal behavior – the “ghosting” phenomenon extended to an extreme and illegal degree. The deliberate act of disappearing, whether in a romantic relationship or in familial commitments, is becoming increasingly prevalent. The husband’s actions represent a grotesque amplification of that tendency.
In conclusion, this entire saga underscores the destructive power of deception and the importance of open communication in resolving conflict. While the husband’s actions are reprehensible, this incident also highlights the need for greater support and understanding for those left behind in the wake of such betrayals. The wife’s decision to end the marriage is a necessary and courageous step towards rebuilding her life and ensuring the well-being of her children. The ordeal serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of choosing evasion over responsibility.