By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Vietnam’s National Assembly approved the construction of a $67 billion high-speed railway connecting Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, spanning 1,541 kilometers. The project, slated to begin in 2027 with completion by 2035, aims to reduce travel time from 30 hours to five hours at speeds up to 350 kph. The line will feature numerous passenger and freight stations, serving both civilian and defense needs. While prioritizing domestic funding, Vietnam may explore affordable, non-restrictive foreign loans.
Read the original article here
Vietnam’s recent approval of a $67 billion high-speed railway project connecting Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City is a truly ambitious undertaking. The sheer scale of the project, representing roughly 10% of Vietnam’s GDP, is staggering and invites comparison to even larger projects in other countries, such as the hypothetical $3 trillion equivalent in the United States. This massive investment highlights Vietnam’s commitment to modernizing its infrastructure and boosting its economy.
The project’s potential benefits are numerous. For one, it promises a significant boost to the tourism industry, facilitating easier and faster travel between the country’s two major cities. Furthermore, if the project is successful in achieving affordability, it could alleviate the chronic traffic congestion currently plaguing the roads connecting Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. This would improve the lives of everyday citizens and make travel more efficient.
However, the project’s timeline remains highly uncertain. Past experiences, such as the delays surrounding the Ho Chi Minh City metro system, raise concerns about the potential for significant delays and cost overruns. Some suggest that the project might not be completed for many years, even decades, fueling skepticism about its feasibility. Concerns regarding corruption also loom large, especially given Vietnam’s history with large-scale infrastructure projects. The considerable financial investment involved makes these concerns particularly salient.
The choice of contractors and technology will be crucial. Given Vietnam’s complex relationship with China, the involvement of Chinese companies in the project is a matter of significant debate. Other potential players include Japan, with its Shinkansen technology, and perhaps even European companies. The selection process will likely be influenced by geopolitical considerations, technological capabilities, and financial factors. The opportunity for Vietnam to leverage this project for technology transfer, enabling the nation to become a player in building high-speed railways for other countries, is a potential long-term benefit.
Comparing this project to similar ventures globally is insightful. The delays and challenges faced by California’s high-speed rail project, which has seen very little progress after fifteen years, stand in stark contrast to Vietnam’s commitment. The success of high-speed rail projects in other densely populated areas, such as Japan, China, and parts of Europe, suggests that the potential benefits are greatest in regions with high population density and concentrated travel demand. The US context, however, is significantly different due to its vast geography and existing transportation infrastructure. The US already boasts a well-established network of roads, highways, airports, and airlines, making the economic justification for a nationwide HSR system less clear. Furthermore, the inherent costs and logistical hurdles in building such a system in the US are immense.
The debate around Vietnam’s project extends to the question of its economic efficiency. While high-speed rail can be a profitable venture in densely populated areas, achieving profitability may require strategies to disincentivize competing modes of transportation, such as car travel, as seen in Japan’s case. Furthermore, ticket prices often make HSR more accessible to affluent travelers than to the general population, except in certain countries like China, where subsidies significantly reduce costs but ultimately lead to financial burdens on the government.
In conclusion, Vietnam’s approval of this ambitious high-speed railway project is a significant development with both enormous potential and considerable challenges. Its success will depend on many factors, including effective management, transparent procurement, efficient construction, and the successful mitigation of corruption. The project’s ultimate impact on Vietnam’s economy and its citizens remains to be seen, but it certainly marks a bold step towards modernization and presents a compelling case study for large-scale infrastructure development in developing nations. The project’s progress will be closely watched by both its supporters and skeptics alike.