By John Q. Hosedrinker 
UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was fatally shot in a premeditated attack outside a Manhattan hotel. Shell casings recovered at the scene bore the words “deny,” “defend,” and “depose,” suggesting a potential motive linked to his professional life. Despite prior threats, Thompson lacked personal security, raising questions about corporate security protocols. The shooter remains at large, and the investigation is ongoing to determine the precise motive behind the assassination.
Read the original article here
Words found on shell casings at the scene where the UnitedHealthcare CEO was shot dead reportedly included “deny,” “defend,” and “depose,” according to a senior law enforcement official. This immediately suggests a connection to the well-known practices within the insurance industry, particularly those detailed in the book “[Delay, Deny, Defend](https://www.amazon.com/Delay-Deny-Defend-Insurance-Companies/dp/1591843154)”. The words mirror the common tactics employed by insurance companies to avoid paying claims, fueling speculation about the motive behind the shooting.
The choice of these particular words, etched onto the shell casings, points to a deliberate message left by the perpetrator. It’s a stark statement against the perceived injustices and unethical practices associated with the insurance giant, and potentially a response to a personally experienced denial of a claim. This isn’t simply a random act of violence; it feels like a targeted assassination with a clear, if somewhat darkly humorous, message.
Many are pointing to the fact that UnitedHealthcare’s lack of company-funded security for its executives, unlike some of its competitors, stands in stark contrast to the level of risk they might face given their line of work. This apparent lack of protection, viewed alongside the words found at the crime scene, highlights a perception of negligence and a disregard for the potential consequences of their actions on the part of the company. The stark absence of security for executives of a company routinely accused of unethical behavior adds another layer to this already complex narrative.
The incident has sparked a wave of online discussion, with many reacting with a mix of shock, dark humor, and a sense of grim satisfaction. Some see the CEO’s death as a karmic consequence of the company’s alleged practices, expressing a deep-seated frustration with the healthcare system and insurance industry’s often ruthless tactics. The seemingly ironic response from many online, a combination of laughter and outrage, speaks volumes about the pervasive anger and disillusionment surrounding healthcare costs and insurance company practices.
However, amidst the online speculation and reaction, the official investigation remains underway. The police’s statement that the motive is still unknown, while technically accurate, feels deeply unconvincing given the highly suggestive nature of the evidence found at the scene. The message inscribed on the casings offers a powerful clue that is difficult to ignore, seeming to confirm the widely held suspicion of the motive behind the shooting.
Despite the clear message, the sheer number of potential suspects who could have a grievance against UnitedHealthcare, based solely on denied claims, makes the investigation undeniably daunting. The scale of potential suspects is enormous, potentially encompassing anyone whose claim has been rejected by the company. This poses a significant challenge to law enforcement and underscores the complexities of this particular investigation.
The incident has also sparked renewed calls for reform within the healthcare system, with many seeing the killing as a grim manifestation of the wider problems with the current model. The widespread feeling that the system is rigged against everyday people fuels outrage and demands for systemic change, making the event a tragic catalyst for wider social commentary.
Regardless of the official narrative, the act itself is a statement against the system, a highly visible and violent protest against the practices of UnitedHealthcare and, by extension, the entire insurance industry. Whether the killer will be caught remains to be seen, but the impact of this incident on public perception of large insurance corporations, and the broader healthcare system, is likely to be long-lasting. The words on those shell casings served as a powerfully succinct indictment, highlighting the vulnerabilities within a system many perceive as broken.