By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On December 15th, Ukraine launched a second wave of ATACMS missile strikes deep into Russia, targeting critical infrastructure. These strikes, employing a combined arms approach with Palen drones to overwhelm air defenses, successfully hit an airbase in Taganrog, an ammunition depot in Markine, and a Bryansk train depot. The high-explosive ATACMS missiles caused significant damage, disrupting Russian logistics, air operations, and impacting their war effort. The combined effect of these attacks is anticipated to reduce Russian offensive capabilities and force a reallocation of resources.
Read the original article here
Ukraine’s recent strike on a Russian air base using Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) missiles represents a significant escalation in the conflict, potentially crippling the enemy’s aircraft repair capabilities. This targeted attack highlights the increasing precision and effectiveness of Ukrainian forces, especially when utilizing advanced weaponry. The impact on Russia’s ability to maintain its air power is likely to be substantial, forcing them to rely more heavily on less sophisticated aircraft and potentially impacting their overall operational capacity.
The strategic importance of targeting air bases like this cannot be overstated. Disrupting repair capabilities directly impacts Russia’s ability to keep its aircraft operational, effectively reducing their air power projection. This is a crucial blow considering the reliance of modern militaries on robust maintenance and repair infrastructure. Such damage could significantly extend the time required for repairs, hindering Russia’s ability to respond to evolving battlefield situations.
This particular strike seems to have caused a significant uproar in Russia, evidenced by the reported reaction from Putin. His outburst suggests the attack landed a powerful blow, exceeding the typical damage inflicted by previous strikes. This underscores the effectiveness of using long-range precision-guided missiles against strategic targets within Russia.
The ongoing destruction of Russian oil refineries and oil fields, as suggested by various comments, is also playing a vital role in weakening Russia’s war effort. Cutting off their energy supply lines is a critical strategy, forcing them to rely on potentially limited and less readily available resources. These combined attacks—on crucial infrastructure and military assets—demonstrate Ukraine’s evolving capacity to strike deep into enemy territory.
Some observers have noted the correlation between the refinery attacks and the recent drop in the ruble. It’s plausible to link the diminished oil production and export capabilities to the currency’s weakening, showing the direct economic ramifications of Ukraine’s offensive actions. This economic strain could further hinder Russia’s capacity to sustain its war machine.
The use of drone swarms is also emerging as a significant factor in the conflict. The potential for overwhelming air defenses using this tactic is noteworthy and suggests the development of future asymmetric warfare strategies. This is a significant factor that will likely force military planners to reconsider how they approach air defense and engagement.
Looking forward, the availability of advanced weapon systems, such as ATACMS missiles, will continue to be a critical factor in Ukraine’s success. While there may be concerns about restrictions on the types of weapons provided, it is undeniable that Ukraine’s access to these systems has had a tangible effect on the conflict.
However, it’s crucial to remember the importance of verifying information coming from both sides. Propaganda and misinformation are rampant, and it’s essential to critically assess all information before drawing conclusions. This is particularly important when assessing reports on battlefield successes or failures. While Ukraine’s advances are evident, taking all information with a grain of salt ensures a more accurate understanding of the situation on the ground.
Overall, the ATACMS missile strike on the Russian air base marks a turning point in the conflict. By crippling the enemy’s aircraft repair capabilities and disrupting its energy supply lines, Ukraine is significantly impacting Russia’s capacity to wage war. The ability to strike strategically important targets deep within Russian territory is a testament to the evolving capabilities of the Ukrainian military and the effectiveness of advanced weapon systems. The long-term impact of this and similar strategic strikes remains to be seen, but it undeniably signifies a shift in the dynamics of the war.