By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Ukraine will continue to target Russian military sites with domestically produced drones and missiles, focusing on bases and infrastructure used in attacks against Ukrainian civilians. This follows a recent Russian attack on a Kherson oncology clinic, a deliberate act of cruelty according to President Zelenskyy, highlighting the ongoing need for increased defense support for Ukraine. The rubble from a Kyiv missile attack on December 20th has been cleared, while efforts continue in Kherson. Zelenskyy expressed gratitude for international support, particularly efforts to bolster European defense spending.
Read the original article here
Zelenskyy’s recent pronouncements regarding continued strikes on Russian military targets and a growing reliance on domestically produced weapons paint a picture of determined resistance and strategic recalibration. Ukraine’s approach is not one of passive reliance on external support; instead, it demonstrates a commitment to self-sufficiency and proactive defense.
The sheer scale of Ukraine’s domestic arms production is remarkable. Millions of domestically produced weapons, including drones, are being manufactured, a level of output that’s almost beyond comprehension. The potential impact of this production on the battlefield is immense, offering a potent counter to Russian aggression. This domestic capability suggests a future where Ukraine’s defense is less dependent on foreign aid, a crucial development in a protracted conflict.
This surge in domestic arms manufacturing is further fueled by the substantial financial resources available. While the exact figures are subject to debate, a significant sum of money, including substantial interest accrued on frozen Russian assets, is directly benefiting Ukraine’s war effort. This financial influx provides the means not only to sustain the conflict but also to drastically expand its own weapons production capabilities. The potential to leverage these assets to fund the war indefinitely and simultaneously boost domestic arms production represents a significant strategic advantage.
The possibility of Ukraine achieving complete self-sufficiency in weapons production is a highly significant goal. Reaching 100% domestic production would dramatically alter the dynamics of the conflict, making Ukraine far less vulnerable to disruptions in external supply chains. This shift would allow Ukraine to dictate the pace and nature of its own defense. Such a scenario would require substantial investment and technological advancement, but the potential payoffs are substantial. It would dramatically reduce the ongoing cost and reliance on foreign support.
The analogy to the Soviet-Afghan War is compelling, albeit imperfect. The comparison highlights the potential for a protracted conflict where a determined defender, equipped with sufficient resources and resolve, can inflict unacceptable costs on a larger, more powerful aggressor. The parallel lies not in a direct mirroring of tactics or outcomes but in the demonstration of resilience and the ability to sustain a long-term resistance against a superior force. It emphasizes the potential for a war of attrition where the will to fight and the ability to sustain it are crucial factors, in this case enhanced significantly by the increase in domestic weapons production.
The implications of Ukraine’s actions are far-reaching. By focusing on domestically produced weapons, Ukraine reduces its dependence on foreign aid and potentially shifts the balance of power in the long run. The ability to sustain this increased arms production will be a significant factor in determining the ultimate outcome of the war. This is more than simply defending territory, it is a plan for long-term national security, showing a commitment to independence that goes beyond the current conflict.
There is also an interesting secondary effect to consider. Successful domestic arms production would not only ensure Ukraine’s defense but could also create a new, significant exporter of arms in the region, reshaping the geopolitical landscape of the post-conflict world. The current conflict, while devastating, might inadvertently lay the foundation for a new, resilient, and independent Ukraine with a powerful arms industry.
Ultimately, Zelenskyy’s focus on domestic weapons production underscores a strategic shift, moving away from reliance on external support and towards self-sufficiency. This is a crucial element of Ukraine’s resistance, demonstrating a commitment not just to immediate survival but also to long-term independence and the rebuilding of a sovereign nation. The continued strikes on Russian military targets serve as a clear indicator that this resolve is both strong and unwavering. The strategy is bold, the risks are high, and the potential rewards—a truly independent and secure Ukraine—are immense.