By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Hongchi Xiao, a proponent of the pseudoscientific “slapping therapy” known as paida lajin, received a 10-year prison sentence for manslaughter. His conviction stems from the death of a diabetic woman who discontinued her insulin under his guidance during a workshop, a decision Xiao supported. This is not an isolated incident; Xiao was previously convicted of manslaughter in Australia for a similar case involving a child. The judge cited Xiao’s lack of remorse and continued promotion of his harmful practices even while imprisoned.
Read the original article here
A 61-year-old alternative healer, Hongchi Xiao, received a 10-year prison sentence in the UK for the manslaughter of a 71-year-old woman, Danielle Carr-Gomm. The conviction stemmed from a fatal incident during one of Xiao’s “slap therapy” workshops.
Carr-Gomm, diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in 1999, had sought alternative treatments to avoid insulin injections. Her desperation led her to Xiao’s workshop, where she ceased taking her prescribed medication.
The workshop, spanning four days, culminated in Carr-Gomm’s severe distress; she howled in pain and frothed at the mouth. Crucially, Xiao failed to seek appropriate medical assistance, a gross negligence that directly contributed to her death.
Carr-Gomm’s son, Matthew, highlighted his mother’s fervent desire for a diabetes cure that didn’t involve injections. This desperation, tragically, made her vulnerable to Xiao’s unsubstantiated claims.
The tragedy underscores the dangers of alternative medicine practices lacking scientific basis. Xiao’s “slap therapy,” touted as a cure-all, clearly proved fatal in this instance. The case raises questions about the regulation and oversight of such practices.
The fact that Carr-Gomm had previously attended a similar workshop in Bulgaria and experienced serious illness after stopping her medication highlights a pattern of neglect and potential endangerment by Xiao. Despite her prior negative experience, Carr-Gomm returned to his “therapy”.
The ten-year sentence reflects the severity of Xiao’s negligence and the resulting loss of life. However, some believe a harsher penalty would have been more appropriate given the consequences of his actions.
Many commenters expressed outrage at Xiao’s actions and the gullibility of some who seek alternative treatments. However, others expressed sympathy for those who, in their desperation, fall prey to such fraudulent practices.
The accessibility of healthcare in the UK, specifically the availability of insulin through the NHS, was brought into question. While Carr-Gomm had access to necessary medical care, she chose to forgo it in favor of the unproven “therapy.”
The discussion extended to the broader issue of regulating alternative medicine and protecting vulnerable individuals from potentially harmful practices. The need for stronger safeguards and stricter enforcement of regulations became a recurring theme.
The case also prompted reflection on the psychological factors influencing individuals to seek alternative treatments. While some dismissed Carr-Gomm’s actions as foolish, many acknowledged the desperation driving people to unconventional remedies, especially when conventional methods feel inadequate or burdensome.
The underlying issue of misinformation and the allure of quick fixes in healthcare were also highlighted. The case served as a stark reminder of the importance of critical thinking and skepticism towards claims lacking scientific evidence.
It’s a complex situation with no easy answers. While the sentence is a legal resolution, the underlying issues of desperation in illness, the spread of misinformation, and the regulation of alternative practices remain. The consequences of choosing unproven therapies can be devastating, as Carr-Gomm’s death tragically illustrates. This case serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based healthcare and the dangers of unchecked alternative practices.