By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Efforts by Trump to circumvent the Senate’s “advice and consent” role in confirming appointments are unconstitutional. Proposed methods, including using recess appointments during a manufactured Senate recess or employing the president’s power to adjourn Congress, are legally flawed and contradict established constitutional interpretations and historical precedent. These schemes would represent an abuse of power, undermining the checks and balances integral to American self-governance. The Senate’s refusal to cooperate and potential judicial intervention would be crucial in preventing such an autocratic maneuver. Such actions are not only unlawful but fundamentally disrespectful of the Constitution.
Read the original article here
The idea that a president could simply dismiss the Senate is alarming, a blatant disregard for the foundational principles of American democracy. It’s a power grab, a move straight out of an authoritarian playbook, and it’s not just illegal; it’s a profound insult to the very concept of constitutionalism.
The suggestion that a president might use the recess appointment power to circumvent the Senate’s advice and consent role is equally concerning. While technically the president *can* make recess appointments, this mechanism was designed for emergencies, not as a routine method to bypass the Senate, especially when the Senate is fully functional and controlled by the president’s own party.
This attempted workaround is a cynical maneuver, a blatant attempt to exploit a procedural loophole for partisan gain. The fact that such a tactic is even being considered exposes a profound lack of respect for established norms and the delicate balance of powers enshrined in the Constitution. To use the Senate’s temporary absence as a pretext to install unqualified individuals in key positions of power is not only ethically questionable but ultimately weakens the very fabric of our system of government.
But what if the attempt goes further? What if, instead of a simple attempt to exploit a recess, the House colludes with the president to force the Senate into an unwanted adjournment? This would be a far more egregious violation of the Constitution, a direct assault on the Senate’s constitutional authority.
Such a move would be a clear and present danger to the American system of checks and balances. The Senate’s role in confirming presidential appointments is vital. It ensures that individuals occupying positions of immense power possess not only the necessary qualifications but also the integrity to act in the best interests of the nation. Bypassing this crucial check undermines accountability and opens the door to potential abuses of power.
The suggestion that the House could simply send the Senate home, creating a manufactured “recess” to facilitate the appointment of unqualified individuals, is frightening. This would be nothing short of a coup, a complete disregard for the democratic processes the Constitution outlines. This is a direct challenge to the rule of law and a blatant attempt to install a system of unchecked power.
The potential consequences of such an action are staggering, far beyond mere political maneuvering. It is a direct attack on the checks and balances carefully built into the system to protect against tyranny. The very notion that this is even being contemplated is terrifying. It’s a sign of a deeper malaise, a disregard for the principles that are the foundation of our government.
We cannot afford to treat this as merely a partisan squabble or a theoretical possibility. The gravity of the situation demands a firm and united response from all those who value the Constitution and the rule of law. This is not a game; it’s a fight for the very soul of our democracy. Any attempt to circumvent the Senate’s role is an attack on the foundation of our government.
This is not about political gamesmanship; it is about the survival of our democratic institutions. We must not stand idly by while the norms that protect us from autocracy are eroded. We must resist this threat, and we must call it out for what it is: a dangerous and unlawful attack on our democracy. The notion that “he can’t” do this is increasingly naïve. The very fact that the conversation is even happening highlights the dangerous erosion of respect for constitutional norms. We must act now to protect our republic from this clear and present danger. The time for complacency is over; the time for action is now.