By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During his presidency, Donald Trump issued 237 acts of clemency—significantly fewer than his predecessor, Barack Obama. These included pardons for high-profile figures like Michael Flynn and Roger Stone, as well as commutations for celebrities like Lil Wayne and Kodak Black. Trump also granted clemency in cases advocating for nonviolent drug offenders and military personnel. The full list encompasses a broad range of individuals and offenses.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s use of the presidential pardon power remains a highly debated topic. The sheer number of pardons granted during his presidency, totaling 237, far surpasses many of his predecessors. This extensive use raises questions about the criteria employed and the potential for political influence.
Among the individuals pardoned by Trump were several figures with close ties to his administration or personal life. Charles Kushner, father-in-law to Jared Kushner, received a pardon after convictions for tax evasion and witness tampering. This pardon, coupled with Kushner’s later nomination as US ambassador to France, sparked significant controversy and accusations of favoritism.
The pardon of Kodak Black, a rapper convicted of making false statements to purchase a firearm, also drew criticism. This exemplifies the broad range of offenses encompassed by Trump’s pardons, encompassing actions ranging from financial crimes to more violent offenses.
The extensive list of pardons encompasses individuals convicted of various crimes, some seemingly deserving of leniency and others more controversial. Several commentators pointed out that a significant percentage of Trump’s pardons bypassed standard review processes within the Pardon Office. This bypass raises concerns about fairness and due process in the application of presidential pardons.
The frequency with which Trump granted pardons, and the perceived lack of transparency in the process, has led many to criticize his approach. Accusations of using the pardon power for political gain, rewarding loyalty, and undermining federal law enforcement have frequently surfaced.
The scale of Trump’s pardons is staggering when compared to previous presidents. While other presidents granted pardons, the numbers under Trump significantly outpaced those of his predecessors, including George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama. This sheer volume alone adds fuel to the debate surrounding the appropriateness and fairness of his pardon decisions.
The motivations behind many of these pardons have been frequently called into question. It’s been argued that several beneficiaries were close associates or supporters who had shown loyalty to Trump, fueling claims that these pardons weren’t based solely on merit or remorse, but rather on political or personal connections.
Furthermore, some believe the actions surrounding these pardons constitute blatant corruption. Concerns extend beyond individual cases, highlighting a broader concern about the potential erosion of trust in the integrity of the justice system. This, coupled with the alleged bypassing of standard review processes, raises concerns about the potential for abuse of power.
The controversy surrounding Trump’s pardons is further intensified by the contrasting narratives surrounding the pardons issued by other presidents. The comparatively smaller number of pardons granted by other presidents is often cited as evidence that Trump’s actions were unprecedented. This has led to accusations of hypocrisy by those who condemn other presidents’ actions while seemingly overlooking Trump’s actions.
The question remains: Was the use of the pardon power by Donald Trump an abuse of power or a justifiable exercise of executive authority? This question has no simple answer, and the debate continues, fueled by differing perspectives and the lasting implications of these controversial actions. The sheer number of pardons and the circumstances surrounding them will undoubtedly continue to be scrutinized for years to come.