By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Rebel forces, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), claim to have swiftly captured Damascus, marking a potential turning point in Syria’s 13-year civil war. This claim, which remains unverified, follows the rebels’ rapid seizure of several major Syrian cities, including Homs, Daraa, and Aleppo, over the past few days. The Syrian Prime Minister stated his intention to remain, yet reports suggest President Assad has fled the capital. International reaction is varied, with the U.S. monitoring the situation and Israel deploying troops to its border.
Read the original article here
Syrian rebels claim they have captured the capital, Damascus, in a stunningly rapid and unexpected victory. The speed of the collapse of Assad’s regime is almost unbelievable, likened by some to the swift fall of the Afghan National Army or even a Jenga tower. This swift victory, achieved within what seems like a matter of hours after other major cities fell, raises immediate questions about the effectiveness of Russian support for Assad’s forces.
The fall of Damascus is being viewed as potentially the culmination of a thirteen-year conflict, a war that has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands, the destruction of entire cities, and the displacement of millions. The sheer speed of the rebel advance suggests a potential breakdown of the Syrian military’s will to fight, rather than a purely military defeat. The lack of significant resistance, coupled with reports of cheering crowds, points to a possible collapse of morale within the Syrian army and a widespread lack of support for the Assad regime among the population.
This lightning-fast victory leaves many questioning the role of Russia and its potential withdrawal of support, particularly considering the simultaneous involvement of Russian forces in the Ukraine conflict. The idea is floated that the redirection of resources away from Syria might explain the rebels’ remarkable success. Russia’s long-term involvement in propping up Assad’s regime, including its controversial actions such as aerial bombardments of civilian targets, is now being reevaluated in light of this dramatic turn of events.
The ramifications of this event for the region are vast and largely unpredictable. A power vacuum is almost certain, and the immediate future is highly uncertain. There are concerns about the potential for further violence and instability, particularly given the release of prisoners from what were essentially torture centers. The potential for retribution and a renewed cycle of violence is substantial. The involvement of various rebel groups, each with their own agendas and potential alliances, complicates the situation enormously.
The impact on various regional powers is highly significant. Iran and Russia, key backers of the Assad regime, have suffered a significant blow to their influence and prestige. This could potentially shift the regional balance of power, particularly concerning Iran’s influence over Lebanon, Jordan, and Israel. Israel, particularly, is likely to be monitoring the situation closely, observing who rises to power and considering potential implications for groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Turkey, having supported rebel groups in the past, is now in a position to potentially exert considerable influence over the future of Syria. The U.S., historically less involved in the Syrian conflict, may face pressure to address this significant development, although any potential engagement appears uncertain at this stage.
The future of Syria is undeniably clouded in uncertainty. There’s discussion of potential power struggles between different rebel groups, each vying for control, and the possibility of renewed conflict or even a new civil war. The potential rise of extremist groups like HTS, despite their attempts at establishing order, adds to the instability. There’s also the question of how various ethnic and religious groups will be integrated into a new political order, with concerns about the potential for further ethnic cleansing.
The events unfolding in Syria are unprecedented in their scale and speed. What began as a relatively slow-burning conflict has exploded into a dramatic power shift, creating considerable uncertainty and anxiety across the region and the globe. The potential for increased global tensions is real, given the regional power dynamics, and the major players in this conflict – Russia, Iran, Turkey, and others – are poised to jostle for position in the wake of this dramatic development. The situation remains in flux, and further developments are expected in the coming days and weeks. It’s clear that this marks a watershed moment in the long and bloody Syrian conflict, though it’s far from clear where the ultimate conclusion will lead.