By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the Syrian rebels’ swift overthrow of Bashar al-Assad, Hadi al-Bahra announced an 18-month transitional period led by a Syrian opposition governing body. This period will include six months dedicated to drafting a new constitution, adhering to UN Security Council Resolution 2254. Al-Bahra emphasized the preservation of Syrian institutions and the revitalization of the economy, with plans to retain most civil servants while replacing political appointees. The transitional government aims to provide humanitarian aid, create jobs, and foster a unified Syria where all citizens enjoy equal rights.
Read the original article here
A Syrian opposition leader has proposed a bold plan for the nation’s transition, envisioning an 18-month period to preserve existing state institutions and pave the way for free elections. This approach, he suggests, would facilitate a smoother transfer of power and prevent a complete collapse of governance during this critical period.
The core of this plan hinges on maintaining the functionality of vital state institutions. This is not about endorsing the current regime’s legitimacy but rather recognizing the practical necessity of retaining essential services, including those related to infrastructure, utilities, and public safety, during the transitional phase. The proposed approach prioritizes maintaining the stability necessary for a free and fair election to occur.
A transitional government, formed by an expanded opposition coalition, would act as the interim authority during this 18-month period. This transitional body would oversee the country’s affairs, ensuring continuity and stability, while working towards a new constitution that accurately reflects the will of the Syrian people. Their primary task would be preparing the nation for free and fair elections. This involves reforming electoral systems, establishing independent election monitoring bodies, and fostering an environment conducive to political participation.
The timeline itself, an 18-month transition, presents both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, it provides a sufficient timeframe for implementing necessary reforms and preparing for elections; on the other hand, 18 months is a considerable length of time in a conflict-ridden environment and necessitates careful coordination and consensus-building among numerous stakeholders. The potential for delays, setbacks, and disagreements remains a significant risk factor.
The success of this transition largely hinges on the willingness of various factions to participate constructively. Internal divisions within the opposition, external interference, and the continued presence of armed groups pose substantial hurdles. The complexities inherent in reaching a consensus among diverse groups with vastly different agendas, beliefs, and priorities, will require skillful diplomacy, compromise, and a commitment to democratic principles from all parties involved.
The opposition leader’s proposal aligns with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2254, which outlines a similar roadmap for Syria’s transition. This alignment emphasizes the international community’s support for a peaceful and democratic resolution to the Syrian conflict and underscores the urgency for a unified approach toward a stable and just future. Adherence to international standards for fair elections, including international observation, is also key to ensuring legitimacy and international recognition of the outcome.
The potential success of this plan is contingent upon several key factors. The most crucial is the genuine commitment of all stakeholders, both internal and external, to uphold democratic principles and prioritize the needs of the Syrian people above narrow political interests. This requires a fundamental shift in power dynamics, demanding mutual trust and cooperation between the various factions.
Beyond the political and institutional elements, economic recovery is paramount. The Syrian economy has been severely damaged by years of conflict, leaving it in desperate need of reconstruction and revitalization. This will be a long and complex process, requiring both domestic and international financial and technical assistance to rebuild infrastructure and stimulate economic growth. The economic recovery is crucial for social cohesion, allowing the stability needed to conduct elections.
Finally, reconciliation and healing are indispensable for the long-term success of Syria’s democratic transition. Years of violence and division have inflicted deep wounds on Syrian society. A genuine effort towards national reconciliation, including addressing past grievances, ensuring accountability for human rights abuses, and fostering social cohesion, is crucial for creating a peaceful and unified nation. The rebuilding of trust among communities will be a long-term undertaking requiring significant investment of time, resources and effort.
In conclusion, the proposed 18-month transition plan offers a pathway to a more democratic future for Syria. Its success will depend on a combination of political will, international support, economic recovery, and a commitment to reconciliation. While the road ahead will undoubtedly be fraught with challenges, the proposal represents a significant step towards a more hopeful and peaceful future for the Syrian people.