By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Jeju Air Boeing 737-800, en route from Bangkok, crashed at South Korea’s Muan International Airport, resulting in at least 29 fatalities and numerous critical injuries. The plane, carrying 181 people, skidded off the runway without apparent landing gear, impacting a wall and igniting a fire. Initial reports suggest a bird strike caused landing gear malfunction. Acting President Choi Sung-mok has ordered a full-scale rescue operation and investigation.
Read the original article here
A plane crash in South Korea, involving a flight with 181 people onboard, has resulted in a tragically large number of casualties. The sheer scale of the disaster is truly shocking, particularly given that the aircraft was already on the ground when the incident occurred. This suggests the most dangerous phase of flight—the actual landing and takeoff—was already complete, which makes the severity of this accident even more disturbing.
The initial reports made the situation seem far less severe than it actually is. Early news coverage downplayed the extent of the damage, leading many to believe injuries would be minor. However, the reality is far more grim, with a significant number of fatalities confirmed. The fact that some survivors have been reported is astonishing, bordering on miraculous, given the violence depicted in the circulating videos.
Many viewers of the accident footage have commented on the intensity of the explosion and the apparent lack of mitigating safety features near the end of the runway. The presence of a solid wall directly after the landing zone is a particular point of concern, as it appeared to contribute significantly to the damage and devastation. The design of this area is coming under intense scrutiny, with questions being raised about the choice of a solid wall over a potentially more forgiving barrier like a softer embankment or even a large area of open land.
The plane’s final moments have raised several questions among aviation experts. The high-speed impact, the apparent lack of deployed flaps and slats, the absence of speed brakes despite full engine reversers, and the high pitch of the rear elevator all suggest a significant deviation from standard landing procedures. The high speed at which the aircraft impacted also indicates some kind of malfunction or failure. The considerable amount of fuel still on board, which should ideally have been dumped before landing in such a situation, raises further questions about the unfolding events.
The possibility of mechanical failure is heavily debated, with some focusing on a potential bird strike causing engine damage and subsequent landing gear failure. However, the possibility of hydraulic system failure has been raised. Even with hydraulic failure, the aircraft possesses a backup gravity undercarriage system, meaning the gear should still be deployable. It’s suggested that the crew may not have attempted to deploy the gravity system, possibly due to other critical events unfolding at the time, perhaps a system failure already compromising other aspects of the landing.
Speculation is rampant online about pre-existing mechanical issues, with some referencing a prior flight emergency that same plane had experienced just a day earlier, necessitating a mid-flight diversion. This raises serious questions about the adequacy of pre-flight checks and maintenance procedures. It’s quite alarming that a plane could have a major incident so soon after a previous emergency and not be grounded.
The fact that a significant number of runway exists before the impact zone adds to the mystery of the crash. This suggests that the aircraft had a substantial amount of space to slow down, further highlighting the gravity of the failure. There is a clear need for a comprehensive and transparent investigation into the precise cause of this tragedy, to prevent similar incidents in the future.
The emotional impact of this disaster cannot be understated. The grief of the families of the victims, the trauma experienced by the survivors, and the fear gripping those in the aviation community are all palpable. This incident has sparked a wider conversation about aviation safety, maintenance procedures, and the potential need for changes in airport infrastructure design, particularly regarding safety features and barriers at the end of runways. The current trend of plane crashes, and the high profile nature of this event, is causing widespread concern and anxiety. The many unanswered questions, the sheer loss of life, and the seemingly preventable nature of the incident leave a lingering sense of profound sadness and a desperate need for answers.