By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Jeju Air flight from Thailand crashed at South Korea’s Muan International Airport, resulting in a death toll that rose to 47. The plane, carrying 175 passengers and six crew members, veered off the runway and struck a wall, sparking a fire. Initial reports suggest bird contact and subsequent landing gear malfunction as the cause. This incident follows a recent Azerbaijani Airlines crash, highlighting aviation safety concerns.
Read the original article here
A Jeju Air flight, number 7C 2216, originating from Bangkok, Thailand, experienced a catastrophic accident upon landing at Muan International Airport in South Korea. Carrying 175 passengers and six crew members, the aircraft veered off the runway and collided with a barrier, resulting in a devastating crash. Initial reports suggested a relatively minor incident, but videos circulating online depict a far more severe situation.
The initial reports painted a picture of a plane simply leaving the runway, possibly due to issues with speed or braking. This narrative, however, drastically underestimates the true scale of the disaster. Videos emerging shortly after the incident show a plane barreling down the runway at considerable speed, with its landing gear apparently not deployed. The lack of deployed landing gear seems to be the critical factor in the plane’s inability to decelerate effectively. This suggests a far more significant mechanical failure than previously assumed. The absence of deployed landing gear is strikingly evident in the footage, making it a central point of investigation into the cause of the crash.
The plane’s momentum carried it well beyond the end of the runway, resulting in a violent impact with a substantial barrier. This barrier, initially described as a fence, appears to be a much more significant structure— possibly a tall embankment— which amplified the impact force considerably. Eyewitness accounts and video footage strongly suggest an explosion following the initial collision, turning the accident into a devastating fireball. The intense nature of the impact and subsequent fire leaves little room for surprise at the high casualty count.
The early reports focused on a potential bird strike leading to landing gear malfunction. While a bird strike could conceivably contribute to such a failure, the sheer speed and trajectory of the aircraft in the videos suggest a more complex sequence of events. It’s not simply a case of the landing gear failing, but a potential cascade of failures leading to the ultimately catastrophic outcome. The lack of any visible attempt at a go-around also warrants investigation. Pilots are trained to execute go-arounds in situations where a safe landing is not possible; the lack of this maneuver adds to the mystery surrounding the events.
The aftermath of the crash is grim, with early reports significantly underestimating the number of casualties. The initial reports mentioned a handful of fatalities, but these were quickly revised upwards as the extent of the damage became clear. The intense fire following the impact and the violent nature of the crash make survival extremely unlikely for many on board. The video evidence is exceptionally disturbing, showing a powerful impact and subsequent fire engulfing the aircraft, leaving little hope for those in the front of the plane.
The location of the impact with the barrier is also a critical aspect. The proximity of the barrier to the end of the runway raises questions about airport safety procedures. Was the barrier appropriately positioned, given the potential for overruns? Should a different type of barrier have been in place, perhaps one designed to absorb or deflect the impact of a large aircraft? These are crucial questions that will undoubtedly be part of the subsequent investigation. The nature of this barrier, a far more substantial structure than a simple fence, contributes to the severity of the outcome.
The sequence of events leading up to the crash requires thorough investigation. Why the landing gear wasn’t deployed, why a go-around wasn’t attempted (if it was even an option at that point), and the overall state of the aircraft prior to landing all need to be addressed. The discrepancy between initial reports and the video footage highlights the challenges in reporting breaking news accurately, particularly in the face of an evolving and dramatic situation. The intense speed of the aircraft on approach and the lack of braking significantly alter the context of the event. It appears less of a simple runway overrun and more a total systems failure.
This tragic event has highlighted the complex and often unpredictable nature of aviation accidents, underscoring the critical role of thorough investigation and a rigorous focus on preventing future occurrences. The sheer devastation captured in the videos serves as a sobering reminder of the risks inherent in air travel, even in ostensibly well-maintained and regulated environments. The severity of the crash calls for a complete and transparent investigation, not only to determine the cause but also to ensure that lessons are learned and implemented to prevent similar tragedies in the future.