By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Large, mysterious drones, some up to six feet in diameter, have been sighted across New Jersey and neighboring states, prompting investigations by the FBI and other agencies. These nighttime flights, which began last month, are concerning officials due to their proximity to military installations and the apparent sophistication evading detection. While authorities stress no immediate public safety threat, the drones’ origin and purpose remain unknown, leading to speculation and calls for increased restrictions on drone operation. The Pentagon, however, has preliminarily ruled out foreign adversaries as the source.
Read the original article here
Homeland Security’s recent statements regarding the mysterious drone flights over New Jersey have left many with more questions than answers. The official line, essentially, is “we don’t know what they are, but don’t worry, there’s no threat.” This lack of transparency fuels speculation and raises concerns about the government’s ability, or willingness, to provide clear information about activities in our airspace.
The fact that these large drones, reportedly the size of cars, are flying near military installations like armories without being shot down suggests a connection to the US government. The official denial that they belong to the military, however, points towards other possibilities, such as the CIA or DARPA. This lack of clarity is frustrating and, frankly, insulting to the public’s intelligence.
The choice of heavily populated areas for these flights, rather than a remote location, is particularly puzzling. Why conduct these seemingly secretive tests over residential areas and near coastlines? Wouldn’t a less populated area be more suitable for such operations? The lack of a clear explanation for this choice only intensifies the mystery.
The available information from the FAA, showing numerous Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) in place, further adds to the enigma. These restrictions, cited for “special security reasons,” cover a substantial timeframe and imply a significant operation. The continued airspace closures suggest an ongoing event, not a single incident.
The absence of high-quality video footage from numerous potential sources, including those equipped with readily available advanced cameras and drones, is also noteworthy. You’d expect someone, somewhere, to have captured clear visuals of these large, regularly sighted objects. The lack of such evidence is, again, peculiar.
While some speculate about foreign involvement, such as China, the likelihood of a foreign power operating drones so openly near sensitive locations within the US is low. The risks of such an operation would be exceptionally high, making it an unlikely scenario. The government’s seemingly nonchalant attitude further supports this theory; if it were a foreign threat, one would expect a much more forceful response.
The sheer number of theories circulating underscores the lack of credible information. Explanations range from mundane possibilities like commercial mapping operations to far-fetched ideas involving extraterrestrial visitors and covert government projects. However, the sheer size of the drones and their close proximity to sensitive areas, including what has been reported near the home of a former president, all but negate the plausible deniability of an unauthorized operation. Therefore, the most likely conclusion is a government-sanctioned project.
The absence of clear answers, however, is unacceptable. The public has a right to know what is happening in its own airspace. The government’s response, or lack thereof, only fuels distrust and increases anxieties. The secrecy surrounding this issue is more worrying than the unknown objects themselves.
The comparison to past events like the Boston Mooninite panic is apt. A lack of transparency often leads to a surge in speculation and even paranoia. And yet, the question remains: Why the secrecy? What could be so sensitive that the government is unwilling to provide even vague explanations? This apparent lack of transparency only fuels the perception of a cover-up.
The official responses lack transparency and are unconvincing. The fact that we are dealing with multiple, apparently large drones, flying for extended periods, near sensitive military installations, and yet somehow this is deemed “not a threat” by Homeland Security, should raise red flags for everyone.
Ultimately, the lack of clear communication from Homeland Security regarding the mysterious drone flights over New Jersey creates a climate of uncertainty and suspicion. Whether the explanations lie in mundane realities or highly classified operations, the public deserves better than vague reassurances and a noticeable absence of tangible evidence. The continued lack of transparency is, perhaps, the most concerning aspect of this ongoing situation. The fact that such large objects can operate with apparent impunity over sensitive locations raises serious questions about our national security and the integrity of our governmental agencies. Until the truth is revealed, the uncertainty will undoubtedly persist, fostering a climate of anxiety and suspicion.