By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the Syrian regime change, Russia’s attempt to bolster its Libyan military base, primarily by transferring equipment from Syria, is facing strong opposition from Libya’s UN-backed government. Prime Minister Dabaiba firmly rejects the use of Libya as a battleground for international conflicts, explicitly forbidding the transfer of Russian weapons. This action is viewed as a significant turning point, potentially jeopardizing Russia’s strategy of maintaining neutrality in Libya’s internal conflict. Simultaneously, increasing US economic pressure, including a potential audit of Libyan finances, is adding to the complexity of the situation and revealing connections between Libyan actors and Russia.
Read the original article here
The Libyan Prime Minister is actively resisting Russia’s attempts to bolster its military presence within the country. This push by Russia comes at a time when its influence in Syria, a previous key Mediterranean foothold, has diminished. The shift of military assets from Syria to Libya reflects Russia’s strategic realignment in the region.
This move, however, is not without significant opposition. Libya is divided between two main factions: the Tripoli-based government, supported by Turkey and Algeria, and the Benghazi-based government led by General Khalifa Haftar, who enjoys the backing of Russia, the UAE, and Egypt. Algeria’s strong opposition to Haftar, coupled with Russia’s support for both Haftar and the Malian junta (which Algeria also opposes), creates a significant geopolitical tension. This complex web of alliances and rivalries makes the situation incredibly volatile.
The 2020 ceasefire remains fragile, and there are concerns that Haftar might exploit Russia’s increased support to launch another offensive. This prospect significantly worries the Tripoli government. The fear is that an influx of Russian military equipment and reinforcements could dramatically shift the balance of power, reigniting the Libyan civil war.
The Tripoli government’s concerns are rooted in the potential for Haftar to significantly increase his military capabilities. An escalation of the conflict could have devastating consequences for the country, potentially undoing years of fragile peace. This underlines the high stakes involved in Russia’s actions and the significant ramifications for regional stability.
The geopolitical landscape further complicates matters. Turkey, a key supporter of the Tripoli government, has recently seen its involvement in Syria decrease, potentially freeing up resources and attention to focus on Libya. However, the future of Syria and the ongoing situation regarding the Kurds remain factors that could influence Turkey’s level of involvement in Libya.
The situation is further muddied by the complex international relations within the conflict. While the United States and the UK officially support the Tripoli government, other nations have taken a different approach. France, Greece, and Cyprus, for example, have largely sided with Haftar due to their aversion to Turkey’s expanding influence and a dispute over maritime boundaries. This international discord highlights the deeply fractured nature of the Libyan conflict and makes any straightforward resolution difficult to achieve.
The dispute surrounding the maritime boundaries and the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) agreement between Turkey and the Tripoli government has significantly influenced the stances of various international players. Greece, particularly, opposes this agreement as it impacts its claimed areas in the Mediterranean. This opposition has led Greece to favor Haftar, despite his links to Russia and other controversial actors. This decision, though, carries considerable risk, as aligning with a figure with such a dubious human rights record risks reputational damage.
The international community’s response to this escalating tension is critical. The fragile peace in Libya is easily disrupted, and any further escalation could have disastrous humanitarian and geopolitical consequences. The power struggle between the various factions, amplified by the significant international actors involved, demands careful diplomatic intervention to prevent a return to widespread conflict. The Libyan people deserve stability and peace, and international efforts to prevent the resurgence of violence are vital.